Comprehensive uncertainty analysis of a Wiebe function-based combustion model for pilot-ignited natural gas engines

Abstract

This paper presents a comprehensive uncertainty analysis of a Wiebe function-based combustion model for advanced low-pilot-ignited natural gas (ALPING) combustion in a single-cylinder research engine. The sensitivities, uncertainty magnification factors (UMFs), and uncertainty percentage contributions (UPCs) of different experimental input variables and model parameters were investigated. First, the Wiebe function model was validated against experimental heat release/mass burned fraction profiles and cylinder pressure histories for three pilot injection timings (start of injection (SOI)): −20°, −40°, and −60° after top dead center (ATDC). Second, the sensitivities and UMFs of predicted cylinder pressure histories were determined. Finally, crank angle-resolved uncertainties were quantified and mapped as ‘uncertainty bounds’ in predicted pressures, which were compared with measured pressure curves with error bars for cyclic variations. The Wiebe function-based combustion model with a quadratic interpolation equation for the specific heat ratio (γ) provided reasonable cylinder pressure and heat release/mass burned fraction predictions for all SOIs (better for −20° and −60° ATDC SOIs compared with −40° ATDC). Uncertainty analysis results indicated that γ (parameters in the quadratic interpolation equation), compression ratio, mass and lower heating value of natural gas trapped in the cylinder, overall trapped mass, and ignition delay were important contributors to the overall uncertainty in predicted cylinder pressures. For all SOIs, γ exhibited the highest UPC values (80–90 per cent) and therefore, γ must be determined with the minimum possible uncertainty to ensure satisfactory predictions of cylinder pressure histories. While the importance of γ in single-zone combustion models is well recognized, the specific contribution of the present analysis is quantification of the crank angle-resolved UPCs of γ and other model parameters to the overall model uncertainty. In this paper, it is shown that uncertainty analysis provides a unique methodology for quantitative validation of crank angle-resolved predictions from any type of engine combustion model with the corresponding experimental results. It is also shown that uncertainties in both predicted and measured cylinder pressures and heat release rates must be considered while validating any engine combustion model.

Keywords

dual-fuel engines pilot ignition combustion modelling uncertainty analysis Wiebe functions

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Miyamoto

Chikahisa

Murayama

Sawyer

‘Description and analysis of diesel engine rate of combustion and performance using Wiebe functions.’ SAE paper 850107, 1985.

Ghojel

J. I.

‘A study of combustion chamber arrangements and heat release in DI diesel engines.’ SAE paper 821034, 1982.

Brandstatter

W. R.

‘Modeling of a stratified charge engine with an unscavenged prechamber.’ In Combustion modeling in reciprocating engines (Eds J. N. Mattavi and C. A. Amman), 1980, pp. 509–536 (Plenum Press, New York).

Kimura

Aoki

Ogawa

Muranaka

Enomoto

‘New combustion concept for ultra-clean high-efficiency small diesel engines.’ SAE paper 1999-01-3681, 1999.

Upatnieks

Mueller

C. J.

‘Clean, controlled DI diesel combustion using dilute charge gas and a short-ignition delay, oxygenated fuel.’ SAE paper 2005-01-0363, 2005.

Christenssen

Johansson

‘Supercharged homogeneous charge compression ignition (HCCI) with exhaust gas recirculation and pilot fuel.’ SAE paper 2000-01-1835, 2000.

Roelle

M. J.

Shaver

G. M.

Gerdes

J. C.

‘Tackling the transition: a multi-model combustion model of SI and HCCI for mode transition control.’ In Proceedings of IMECE'04, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, 13–19 November 2004, paper number IMECE2004–62188.

Depcik

Jacobs

Hagena

Assanis

‘Instructional use of a single-zone, premixed charge, spark-ignition engine heat release simulation.’

Int. J. Mech. Engng Educ. 35 (1) (2007): 1–31.

Brunt

M. F. J.

Emtage

A. L.

‘Evaluation of burn rate routines and analysis errors.’ SAE paper 970037, 1997.

10.

Brunt

M. F. J.

Platts

K. C.

‘Calculation of heat release in direct injection diesel engines.’ SAE paper 1999-01-0187, 1999.

11.

Krishnan

S. R.

Srinivasan

K. K.

Singh

Bell

S. R.

Midkiff

K. C.

Gong

Fiveland

S. B.

Willi

‘Strategies for reduced NO_x emissions in pilot ignited natural gas engines.’

Trans. ASME, J. Engng Gas Turb. Power 126 (2004): 665–671.

12.

Singh

Krishnan

S. R.

Srinivasan

K. K.

Midkiff

K. C.

Bell

S. R.

‘Effect of pilot injection timing, pilot quantity, and intake charge conditions on performance and NO_x emissions for an advanced low-pilot-ignited natural gas engine.’

Int. J. Engine Res. 5 (4) (2004): 329–348.

13.

Srinivasan

K. K.

Krishnan

S. R.

Singh

Midkiff

K. C.

Bell

S. R.

Gong

Fiveland

S. B.

Willi

‘The advanced low pilot ignited natural gas engine – a combustion analysis.’

Trans. ASME, J. Engng Gas Turb. Power 128 (2006): 213–218.

14.

Srinivasan

K. K.

Krishnan

S. R.

Midkiff

K. C.

‘Improving low load combustion, stability, and emissions in pilot-ignited natural gas engines.’

Proc. IMechE, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering 220 (2006): 229–239 DOI: 10.1243/09544070JAUTO104.

15.

Srinivasan

K. K.

Krishnan

S. R.

Yang

Midkiff

K. C.

‘Analysis of diesel pilot-ignited natural gas low-temperature combustion with hot exhaust gas recirculation.’

Combust. Sci. Technol. 179 (9) (2007): 1737–1776.

16.

Heywood

Internal combustion engine fundamentals (McGraw-Hill 1988).

17.

Ferguson

C. R.

Kirkpatrick

A. T.

Internal combustion engines (Wiley 2001).

18.

Zucrow

Hoffman

J. D.

Gas dynamics (Wiley 1976).

19.

Hayes

T. K.

Savage

L. D.

‘Cylinder pressure data acquisition and heat release analysis on a personal computer.’ SAE paper 8660029, 1986.

20.

Rocco

‘D.I. diesel engine in-cylinder pressure data analysis under T.D.C. setting error.’ SAE paper 930595, 1993.

21.

Brown

B. R.

Combustion data acquisition and analysis MEng Automotive Engineering Thesis, Loughborough University, 2001.

22.

Hardenberg

H. O.

Hase

F. W.

‘An empirical formula for computing the pressure rise delay of a fuel from its cetane number and from the relevant parameters of direct-injection diesel engines.’ SAE paper 790493, 1979.

23.

Woschni

‘A universally applicable heat transfer equation for the instantaneous heat transfer coefficient in the internal combustion engine.’ SAE paper 670931, 1967.

24.

Test uncertainty (American Society of Mechanical Engineers 2006).

25.

Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (ISO 1993).

26.

Coleman

H. W.

Steele

W. G.

Experimentation and uncertainty analysis for engineers (Wiley 1999).

27.

Lancaster

D. R.

Krieger

R. B.

Lienesch

J. H.

‘Measurement and analysis of engine pressure data.’ SAE paper 750026, 1975.