Optimization of an automotive side door beam,considering static requirement

Abstract

Door stiffness is one of the important factors in side impact. A side door beam is installed in the door to protect occupants from side impact. Generally, side impact performance has been calculated with the assembled door unit or the body-in-white (BIW) system. Thus, the effects of a side door beam should be investigated after a BIW system is designed. This research concentrates on the side door beam, which will be optimized. The cross-section of a side door beam is defined to have an elliptic shape. An optimization problem is formulated to find the design maximizing the crush stiffness within the specified weight. Design variables are the radii and the thickness of the side door beam with the elliptic section. Analysis of the side impact is carried out by the non-linear finite element method. The optimization problem is solved by two methods. One is the experimental design scheme using an orthogonal array. The other is optimization using the response surface method (RSM). Both methods have obtained better designs than the current one.

Keywords

optimization design of experiments side door beam body-in-white response surface method

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Guerlement

Targowski

Gutkowski

Zawidzka

Zawidzki

Discrete minimum weight design of steel structure using EC3 code

Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 2001, 22 (4), 322–327.

Kim

C. H.

Mijar

J. S.

Arora

J. S.

Development of simplified models for design and optimization of automotive structures for crashworthiness

Struct. Multidisc. Optim., 2001, 22 (4), 307–321.

Marklund

P. P.

Nilsson

Optimization of a car body component subjected to side impact

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2001, 215 (5), 383–392.

Shin

M. K.

Hong

S. W.

Park

G. J.

Axiomatic design of the motor-driven tilt/telescopic steering system for safety and vibration

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 2001, 215 (2), 179–187.

Side impact protection. FMVSS Standard 214, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Patberg

Philipps

Dittmann

Fiber-reinforced composites in the car side structure

Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D: J. Automobile Engineering, 1999, 231 (5), 417–423.

Lorenzo

Burr

Karen

R. K.

Integrated inner door panel/energy absorber designs for side impact occupation protection. SAE paper 960151, 1996.

Hobbs

C. A.

Dispelling the misconceptions about side impact protection. SAE paper 950879, 1995.

Syamal

P. K.

Yang

C. J.

Crashworthiness simulation, design and development of cross-car stiffener subsystem. SAE paper 951083, 1995.

10.

Blaisdell

Stephens

Collision performance of automotive door systems. SAE paper 940562, 1994.

11.

Taguchi

Systems of Experimental Design, 1987, Vols I and II (Kraus International Publications, New York).

12.

Lee

K. H.

Park

G. J.

Robust optimization in discrete design space for constrained problems

Am. Inst. Aeronaut. Astronaut. J., 2002, 40 (4), 774–780.

13.

LS-DYNA User's Manual, 1999 (Livermore Software Technology, Colorado, USA).

14.

Bathe

K. J.

Finite Element Procedures, 1995 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

15.

Phadke

M. S.

Quality Engineering Using Robust Design, 1989 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey).

16.

Peace

G. S.

Taguchi Methods: A Hands-On Approach, 1995 (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts).

17.

Montgomery

D. C.

Design and Analysis of Experiments, 1991 (John Wiley, Singapore).

18.

Jeang

Chang

C. L.

Concurrent optimization of parameter and tolerance design via computer simulation and statistic method

Int. J. Adv. Mfg Technol., 2002, 19 (6), 432–441.

19.

MINTab Help: Release 12, 1997 (Minitab).

20.

VisualDOC Manual 1.0, 1998 (VR & D, Colorado).