A non-linear model of an adjustable automotive damper is developed, which includes the compressibility of the fluid, trapped gas and expansion of the cylinder. The parameters for the model are selected by fitting the model to experimentally obtained data from the damper. The model is shown to give an excellent representation of the damper under investigation. The performance of the damper model is examined as the parameters are varied, and the results are discussed.
LangH. H.A study of the characteristics of automotive dampers at high stroking frequencies. PhD thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, 1977.
2.
HallB. B.GillK. F.Performance of a telescopic dual-tube automotive damper and the implications for vehicle ride prediction. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 200(D2), 1986.
3.
KaradayiR.MasadaG. Y.A nonlinear shock absorber model. In Proceedings of ASMS Symposium on Simulation and Control of Ground Vehicles and Transportation Systems, 1986, AMD-Vol. 80, DSC-Vol. 2.
4.
HagedornP.WallaschekJ.On equivalent harmonic and stochastic linearization for nonlinear shock-absorbers. In Proceedings of Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamic Engineering Systems IUTAM Symposium, Innsbruk/Igls, Austria, 21-26 June 1987.
5.
WallaschekJ.Dynamics of non-linear automobile shock- absorbers. Int. J. Non-Linear Mech., 1990, 25(2/3), 299–308.
6.
SuraceC.WordenK.TomlinsonG. R.An improved nonlinear model for an automotive shock absorber. Nonlinear Dynamics, 1992, 3, 413–429.
7.
MerritH. E.Hydraulic Control Systems, 1967 (John Wiley).
8.
HaessigD. A.FriedlandB.On the modeling and simulation of friction. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Syst., Measmt and Control, 1991, 113, 354–362.
9.
BelingardiG.CampanileP.Improvement of the shock absorber dynamic simulation by the restoring force mapping method. In Proceedings of 15th International Seminar on Modal Analysis and Structural Dynamics, Leuven, Belgium, 1990.
10.
CaffertyS.TomlinsonG. R.Characterization of automotive dampers using higher order frequency response functions. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1997, 211(D3), 181–203.
11.
SuraceC.StorerD.TomlinsonG. R.Characterising an automotive shock absorber and the dependence on temperature. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Modal Analysis, San Diego, California, 1992, pp. 1317–1326.
12.
Matlab, Simulink and Optimisation Toolbox (The Mathworks, Inc., Natick, Massachusetts).
13.
WordenK.Data processing and experimental design for the restoring force surface method, Part I: Integration and differentiation of the measured time data. Mech. Syst. and Signal Processing, 1990, 4(4), 295–319.
14.
CaffertyS.Characterization of automotive shock absorbers using time and frequency domain techniques. PhD thesis, Department of Engineering, University of Manchester, 1996.
