This paper describes a theoretical investigation into the reduction of road damage through use of active and semi-active suspensions. Two new linear state feedback control strategies are described. These regulate aspects of the vehicle response that are believed to be closely related to road damage. Comparisons are made with two established control strategies. The relative performance of the four controllers is examined using a two-axle planar heavy vehicle model, with both active and semi-active suspensions.
Significant improvements are predicted for the three control strategies which account for correlation between the road roughness inputs at the front and rear of the vehicle, both for the active and semi-active suspensions. The state feedback preview control strategy previously developed by Sharp and Wilson [1] is found to give the best all-round performance for a suspension with semi-active suspension dampers.
SharpR. S.WilsonD. A.On control laws for vehicle suspensions accounting for input correlations. VSD, 1990, 19, 353–363.
2.
Highways and transportation statistics, 1995/96 estimates and 1993/94 actuals. The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, Statistical Information Service 14.95, 1995.
3.
CebonD.Interaction between heavy vehicles and roads. SAE SP-951, 930001, 1993.
4.
Council Directive 92/7/EEC, The Council of the European Communities, 1992.
5.
CollopA. C.CebonD.Effects of road-friendly suspensions on long-term flexible pavement performance. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1997, 211(C6), 411–424.
6.
PotterT. E. C.CebonD.ColeD. J.Assessing ‘road-friendliness’: A review. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1997, 211(D6), 455–475.
The AASHO Road Test, Report 7, Summary Report, Highway Research Board, Special Report 61G, 1962.
9.
CebonD.An investigation of the dynamic interaction between wheeled vehicles and road surfaces. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1985.
10.
CebonD.Assessment of the dynamic wheel forces generated by heavy road vehicles. In Proceedings of ARRB/FORS Symposium on Heavy Vehicle Suspension Characteristics, Canberra, 1987 (Australian Road Research Board).
11.
ColeD. J.CebonD.Spatial repeatability of dynamic tyre forces generated by heavy vehicles. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1992, 206(D1), 17–27.
12.
ColeD. J.CollopA. C.PotterT. E. C.CebonD.Spatial repeatability of measured dynamic tyre forces. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1996, 210(D3), 185–197.
13.
PotterT. E. C.CebonD.CollopA. C.ColeD. J.Road damaging potential of measured dynamic tyre forces in mixed traffic. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1996, 210(D3), 215–225.
14.
ColeD. J.CebonD.Truck suspension design to minimize road damage. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1996, 210(D2), 95–107.
15.
YiK.HedrickJ. K.Active and semi-active heavy truck suspension to reduce pavement damage. SAE SP 802, paper 892486, 1989, pp. 29–36.
16.
BesingerF. H.The performance of passive and semi-active suspensions for lorries. PhD thesis, Cambridge University Engineering Department, 1992.
17.
CollopA. C.CebonD.A model of whole-life flexible pavement performance. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part C, Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 1995, 209(C6), 389–408.
18.
LouamN.WilsonD. A.SharpR. S.Optimization and performance enhancement of active suspensions for automobiles under preview of the road. VSD, 1992, 21(1), 39–63.
19.
HuismanR. G. M.A controller and observer for active suspensions with preview. Thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 1994.
SharpR. S.HassanS. A.Performance and design considerations for dissipative semi-active suspension systems for automobiles. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part D, Journal of Automobile Engineering, 1986, 201(D2), 149–153.
22.
KitchingK. J.ColeD. J.CebonD.Performance of a semi-active damper for heavy vehicles. Trans. ASME, J. Dynamic Syst. Measmt, and Control, 1999 (in press).
WilsonD. A.SharpR. S.HassanS. A.The application of linear optimal control theory to the design of active automotive suspensions. VSD, 1986, 15, 105–118.
25.
ThompsonA. G.PearceC. E. M.An optimal suspension for an automobile on a random road. SAE paper 790478, 1979.
26.
KwakernaakH.SivanR.Linear Optimal Control Systems, 1972 (Wiley-Interscience, New York).
27.
HacA.Optimal linear preview control of active vehicle suspensions. VSD, 1992, 21, 167–195.
28.
KitchingK. J.Semi-active damping of heavy vehicles. PhD thesis, Cambridge University, 1997.
29.
SchuringD. J.GusakovL.Tire transient force and moment response to simultaneous variations of slip angle and load. SAE paper 760032, 1976.
30.
HuismanR. G. M.VeldpausF. E.VeotsH. J. M.KokJ. J.An optimal continuous time strategy for active suspensions with preview. Veh. Syst. Dynamics, 1992, 22, 43–55.
31.
PilbeamC.Slow-active and passive control of automotive suspension system vibrations. PhD dissertation thesis, Cranfield University, School of Mechanical Engineering, 1995.
32.
HacA.YounI.Optimal semi-active suspension with preview based on a quarter car model. In Proceedings of IEEE American Control Conference, Boston, Massachusetts, 1991.
33.
SolimanA. M. A.CrollaD. A.Preview control of a semi-active suspension system. Int. J. Veh. Des., 1996, 17(4), 384–397.
34.
WilkinsonP. A.CrollaD. A.Development of sub-optimally controlled suspensions for articulated trucks to reduce vibration and road wear. In Proceedings of IMechE Vehicle and Handling Conference, 1992.
