Echolocation systems used by bats may be used by engineers wishing to emulate the performance of these biological systems. Comparisons are made between biosonar systems based on water and air, the signal structures used by animals echolocating in air, and the limits on resolution. The current thinking in how biological systems operate are discussed, as are the engineering challenges of replicating the performance levels demonstrated by echolocating animals.
GriffinD. R.GalambosR.The sensory basis of obstacle avoidance by flying bats. J. Exp. Zool., 1941, 86(3), 481–506.
2.
GriffinD. R.Listening in the dark, 1958 (Yale University Press, Yale).
3.
StoffregenT. A.PittengerJ.B.Human echolocation as a basic form of perception and action. Ecol. Psychol., 1995, 7(3), 181–216.
4.
KaltwasserM. T.SchnitzlerH. U.Echolocation signals confirmed in rats. Z. Saugetierk., 1981, 46(6), 394–395.
5.
KimchiT.ReshefM.TerkelJ.Evidence for the use of reflected self-generated seismic waves for spatial orientation in a blind subterranean mammal. J. Expl. Biol., 2005, 208(4), 647–659.
6.
KonishiM.KnudsenE. I.Oilbird - hearing and echolocation. Science, 1979, 204(4391), 425–427.
7.
PriceJ. J.JohnsonK. P.ClaytonD. H.The evolution of echolocation in swiftlets. J. Avian Biol., 2004, 35(2), 135–143.
8.
AuW. W. L.The sonar of dolphins, 1993 (Springer, New York).
9.
WatersD. A.VollrathC.Echolocation performance and call structure in the megachiropteran fruit-bat Rousettus aegyptiacus. Acta Chirop., 2003, 5(2), 209–219.
10.
JonesG.TeelingE. C.The evolution of echolocation in bats. Trends Ecol. Evol., 2006, 21(3), 149–156.
11.
MøhlB.Target detection by echolocating bats. In Animal sonar: Processes and performance (Eds NachtigallP. E.MooreP. W. B.), 1988, pp. 435–450 (Plenum Press, New York).
12.
WatersD. A.JonesG.Echolocation call structure and intensity in 5 species of insectivorous bats. J. Expl. Biol., 1995, 198(2), 475–489.
13.
SurlykkeA.MillerL. A.MøhlB.AndersenB. B.ChristensendalsgaardJ.JorgensenM. B.Echolocation in 2 very small bats from Thailand - Craseonycteris thonglongyai andMyotis siligorensis. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1993, 33(1), 1–12.
14.
JensenM. E.MillerL. A.Echolocation signals of the bat Eptesicus serotinus recorded using a vertical microphone array: Effect of flight altitude on searching signals. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1999, 47(1-2), 60–69.
15.
HolderiedM. W.von HelversenO.Echolocation range and wingbeat period match in aerial-hawking bats. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 2003, 270(1530), 2293–2299.
16.
HolderiedM. W.KorineC.FentonM. B.ParsonsS.RobsonS.JonesG.Echolocation call intensity in the aerial hawking bat Eptesicus bottae (Vespertilionidae) studied using stereo videogrammetry. J. Expl. Biol., 2005, 208(7), 1321–1327.
17.
StapellsD. R.PictonT. W.SmithA. D.Normal hearing thresholds for clicks. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1982, 72(1), 74–79.
18.
BazleyE. N.Sound absorption in air at frequencies up to 100 kHz, 1976 (National Physics Laboratory, Teddington, UK).
19.
GriffinD. R.Importance of atmospheric attenuation for echolocation of bats (Chiroptera). Anim. Behav., 1971, 19, 55–61.
20.
LawrenceB. D.SimmonsJ. A.Measurements of atmospheric attenuation at ultrasonic frequencies and the significance for echolocation by bats. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1982, 71(3), 585–590.
21.
PyeJ. D.Is fidelity futile? The ‘true’ signal is illusory, especially with ultrasound. Bioacoustics, 1993, 4, 271–286.
WatersD. A.RydellJ.JonesG.Echolocation call design and limits on prey size - a case-study using the aerial hawking batNyctalus leisleri. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 1995, 37(5), 321–328.
24.
ObristM. K.FentonM. B.EgerJ. L.SchlegelP. A.What ears do for bats - a comparative-study of pinna sound pressure transformation in Chiroptera. J. Expl. Biol., 1993, 180, 119–152.
25.
CranfordT. W.In search of impulse sound sources in odontocetes. In Hearing by whales and dolphins (Eds AuW. W. L.PopperA. N.FayR. R.), 2000, p. 485 (Springer-Verlag, New York).
26.
HollandR. A.WinterP.WatersD. A.Sensory systems and spatial memory in the fruit batRousettus aegyptiacus. Ethology, 2005, 111(8), 715–725.
27.
AuW. W. L.MooreP. W. B.PawloskiD.Echolocation transmitting beam of the Atlantic bottle-nosed-dolphin. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1986, 80(2), 688–691.
28.
CranfordT. W.AmundinM.Biosonar pulse production in odontocetes: The state of our knowledge. In Echolocation in bats and dolphins (Eds ThomasJ. A.MossC. F.VaterM.), 2004, pp. 27–43 (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
29.
NorbergU. M.RaynerJ.M. V.Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera) - wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 1987, 316(1179), 337–419.
30.
FentonM. B.BellG. P.Recognition of species of insectivorous bats by their echolocation calls. J. Mammal., 1981, 62(2), 233–243.
31.
FullardJ. H.The tuning of moth ears. Experientia, 1988, 44(5), 423–428.
32.
PaveyC. R.BurwellC. J.Bat predation on eared moths: A test of the allotonic frequency hypothesis. Oikos, 1998, 81(1), 143–151.
33.
NorbergU. M.RaynerJ. M. V.Ecological morphology and flight in bats (Mammalia, Chiroptera): Wing adaptations, flight performance, foraging strategy and echolocation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci., 1987, 316, 335–427.
34.
KalkoE. K. V.Insect pursuit, prey capture and echolocation in pipistrelle bats (Microchiroptera). Anim. Behav., 1995, 50, 861–880.
35.
VaughanN.JonesG.HarrisS.Identification of British bat species by multivariate analysis of echolocation call parameters. Bioacoustics, 1997, 7(3), 189–207.
36.
AltesR. A.TitlebauE. L.Bat signals as optimally Doppler tolerant waveforms. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1970, 48(4), 1014–1020.
37.
HolderiedM. W.JonesG.Von HelversenO.Flight and echolocation behaviour of whiskered bats commuting along a hedgerow: Range-dependent sonar signal design, Doppler tolerance and evidence for ‘acoustic focussing’. J. Expl. Biol., 2006, 209(10), 1816–1826.
38.
BoonmanA.SchnitzlerH. U.Frequency modulation patterns in the echolocation signals of two vespertilionid bats. J. Comp. Physiol. A, Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol., 2005, 191(1), 13–21.
39.
BoonmanA. M.ParsonsS.JonesG.The influence of flight speed on the ranging performance of bats using frequency modulated echolocation pulses. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2003, 113(1), 617–628.
40.
FuzesseryZ. M.Monaural and binaural spectral cues created by the external ears of the pallid bat. Hear. Res., 1996, 95(1-2), 1–17.
41.
SchnitzlerH. U.GrinnellA. D.Directional sensitivity of echolocation in horseshoe hat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum.1. Directionality of sound emission. J. Comp. Physiol., 1977, 116(1), 51–61.
42.
MastersW. M.HarleyH. E.Performance and cognition in echolocating mammals. In Echolocation in bats and dolphins (Eds ThomasJ. A.MossC. F.VaterM.), 2004, pp. 249–259 (The University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
43.
MøhlB.Detection by a pipistrelle bat of normal and reversed replica of its sonar pulses. Acustica, 1986, 61(1), 75–84.
44.
MastersW. M.JacobsS. C.Target detection and range resolution by the big brown bat (Eptesicus fuscus) using normal and time-reversed model echoes. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1989, 166(1), 65–73.
45.
FerragamoM. J.HaresignT.SimmonsJ. A.Frequency tuning, latencies, and responses to frequency-modulated sweeps in the inferior colliculus of the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1998, 182(1), 65–79.
46.
MossC. F.SimmonsJ. A.Acoustic image representation of a point target in the bat Eptesicus fuscus - evidence for sensitivity to echo phase in bat sonar. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1993, 93(3), 1553–1562.
47.
SaillantP. A.SimmonsJ. A.DearS. P.A computational model of echo processing and acoustic imaging in frequency-modulated echolocating bats - the spectrogram correlation and transformation receiver. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1993, 94(5), 2691–2712.
48.
MatsuoI.YanoM.An echolocation model for the restoration of an acoustic image from a single-emission echo. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2004, 116(6), 3782–3788.
49.
SimmonsJ. A.NerettiN.IntratorN.AltesR. A.FerragamoM. J.SandersonM. I.Delay accuracy in bat sonar is related to the reciprocal of normalized echo bandwidth, orQ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101(10), 3638–3643.
50.
SimmonsJ. A.FerragamoM. J.SandersonM. I.Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus. J. Comp. Physiol. A, Neuroethol. Sens. Neural Behav. Physiol., 2003, 189(9), 693–702.
51.
SimmonsJ. A.SaillantP. A.WottonJ. M.HaresignT.FerragamoM. J.MossC. F.Composition of biosonar images for target recognition by echolocating bats. Neural Netw., 1995, 8(7-8), 1239–1261.
52.
MogdansJ.SchnitzlerH. U.OstwaldJ.Discrimination of 2-wave-front echoes by the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus - behavioral-experiments and receiver simulations. J. Comp. Physiol. A, 1993, 172(3), 309–323.
53.
SchnitzlerH. U.FliegerE.Detection of oscillating target movements by echolocation in the greater horseshoe bat. J. Comp. Physiol., 1983, 153(3), 385–391.
54.
BaronG.StephanH.FrahmH. D.Comparative neurobiology in chiroptera: Brain characteristics in functional systems, ecoethological adaptation, adaptive radiation and evolution: 3, 1996 (Birkhauser, Basle).
55.
PollakG. D.CassedayJ. H.The neural basis of echolocation in bats, 1989 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin).
KucR.Biomimetic sonar locates and recognizes objects. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng., 1997, 22(4), 616–624.
58.
CarmenaJ. M.HallamJ. C. T.The use of Doppler in sonar-based mobile robot navigation: Inspirations from biology. Inf. Sci., 2004, 161(1-2), 71–94.
59.
CarmenaJ. M.KampchenN.KimD.HallamJ. C. T.Artificial ears for a biomimetic sonarhead: From multiple reflectors to surfaces. Artif. Life, 2001, 7(2), 147–169.
60.
ChittajalluS. K.KohrtK. G.PalakalM. J.WongD.Computational model of the bat auditory periphery. Math. Comput. Model., 1996, 24(1), 67–78.
61.
KucR.Neuro-computational processing of moving sonar echoes classifies and localizes foliage. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2004, 116(3), 1811–1818.
KucR.Forward model for sonar maps produced with the polaroid ranging module. IEEE Trans. Robot. Autom., 2003, 19(2), 358–362.
66.
RafiqM.WykesC.The performance of capacitive ultrasonic transducers using V-grooved backplates. Meas. Sci. Technol., 1991, 2(2), 168–174.
67.
MachmerthH.TheissD.SchnitzlerH. U.Construction of an ultrasonic air transmitter with constant frequency-response in range from 15 kHz to 130 kHz. Acustica, 1975, 34(2), 81–85.
68.
MorseP. M.Vibration and sound, 1948 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
69.
PeremansH.Broad beamwidth ultrasonic transducers for tri-aural perception. J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 1997, 102(3), 1567–1572.
70.
CampaniR.BottinelliO.CallidaF.CosciaD.The latest in ultrasound: Three-dimensional imaging. Part II. Eur. J. Radiol., 27(Suppl. 2), S183–S187.
71.
WatersD. A.AbululaH. H.Using bat-modelled sonar as a navigational tool in virtual environments. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact, in press.
72.
GalambosR.GriffinD. R.Obstacle avoidance by flying bats - the cries of bats. J. Expl. Zool., 1942, 89(3), 475–490.
73.
GrunwaldJ. E.SchornichS.WiegrebeL.Classification of natural textures in echolocation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 2004, 101(15), 5670–5674.
74.
ZimmerW. M. X.JohnsonM. P.MadsenP. T.TyackP. L.Echolocation clicks of free-ranging Cuvier's beaked whales (Ziphius cavirostris). J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 2005, 117(6), 3919–3927.
