The response to pure bending of tubes with rectangular cut-outs is considered. Experiments on 1000-mm long, 100-mm diameter, and 2.55-mm wall thickness DIN 2391 ST NBK supported steel tubes are described. Such a thickness-to-diameter ratio is typical of structural columns, rather than shell structures. Tubes containing cut-outs with an axial dimension of up to 30 mm and a circumferential size of up to 180° were tested. It was found that plastic hinge mechanisms dominated the response when the cut-out was on the compressive side, whereas fracture behaviour dominated the response when the cut-out was on the tensile side. Finite element and semi-empirical analyses were carried out to predict the global load-deformation behaviour of the tubes. All analyses gave reasonable predictions of the experimental results for the majority of the cut-out parameters investigated. The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility of using cut-outs to initiate and control the toppling of offshore jacket structures.
MetcalfR.To remove or not to remove: A legal perspective. In Proceedings of Strategies for successful abandonment, London, UK, October 1995 (IBC Technical Services, London).
2.
EbdonR. W.EllinasC. P.Decommissioning and removal of offshore structures: A state of the art. In Proceedings of Eighth International Conference on Offshore mechanics and arctic engineering, The Hague, The Netherlands, 19–23 March 1989 (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, London).
3.
FjellsaO.Decommissioning of offshore structures: The Norwegian approach. In Proceedings of First International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Edinburgh, UK, 11–16 August 1991 (International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Golden, CO, USA).
4.
MoritisG.Industry tackles offshore decommissioning. Oil Gas J. Special, 1997, 33–36.
5.
IzzuddinB. A.Toppling analysis of offshore jacket structures. In Proceedings of Sixth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference, Los Angeles, USA, 26–31 May 1996, pp. 169–175 (International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, Golden, CO, USA).
Al-HassaniS. T. S.Explosive cutting research in the decommissioning of offshore structures. In Proceedings of International Conference on Decommissioning offshore, onshore demolition and nuclear works, 1990, pp. 41–46.
8.
Al-HassaniS. T. S.VartdalB. J.GjelsvikK. E.BurleyS. J.Toppling feasibility of Ekofisk 1 steel jackets. 02–03/12-R-006, Department of Mechanical Engineering, UMIST, Manchester, UK, September 1998.
9.
UMIST and Reverse Engineering Ltd.The hinge study final report. REL 02–03/12-R-005, Department of Mechanical Engineering, UMIST, Manchester, UK, April 1996.
10.
van AanholdtJ. E.TabyJ.Analysis of structures with damaged structural members. STF88 A83002, SINTEF, Norway, 1983.
11.
LekkerkerkerJ. G.Stress concentrations around circular holes in cylindrical shells. In Proceedings of 11th International Congress of Applied Mechanics, Munich, Germany, 1964, pp. 283–288.
12.
LureA. I.Concentration of stresses in the vicinity of an aperture of a circular cylinder. Prikladnaya Matematika i Mekhanika, 1946, 10, 397–406.
13.
van DykeP.Stresses about a circular hole in a cylindrical shell. AIAA J., 1965, 3, 1733–1742.
14.
SavinG. N.Stress distribution around holes. NASA TT F-607, NASA Translations, 1970.
15.
JullienJ. F.LimamA.Effects of openings of the buckling of cylindrical shells subjected to axial compression. Thin Wall. Struct., 1998, 31(1–3), 187–202.
16.
AlmrothB. O.HolmesA. M. C.Buckling of shells with cutouts, experiment and analysis. Int. J. Solids Struct., 1972, 8 (8), 1057–1071.
17.
BroganF. A.AlmrothB. O.Buckling of cylinders with cutouts. AIAA J., 1969, 8 (2), 236–241.
18.
StarnesJ. H.The effects of cut-outs on the buckling of thin shells. In Proceedings of Symposium on Thin-shell structures: theory, experiment and design, Pasadena, USA, 1974 (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA).
19.
TennysonR. C.The effects of unreinforced circular cylindrical holes on the buckling of circular cylindrical shells. J. Eng. Indust. Trans ASME, 1968, 90, 541–546.
20.
FooS. S. B.On the limit analysis of cylindrical shells with a single cutout. Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 1992, 49 (1), 1–16.
21.
FridmanA. D.Asymptotic method of investigating the deformation of cylindrical shells with holes. Soviet Appl. Mech., 1985, 22 (12), 84–89.
22.
HoonK. H.SohA. K.Behaviour of pipes with a circular hole subjected to compressive loading. Strain, 1997, 33 (1), 21–27.
23.
FontaineB.The behaviour of steel tubes fitted with apertures subjected to bending and torsion. Acier, 1966, 31, 347–350.
24.
LittleG. H.BabanS. A.The bending strength of steel lighting columns. Red Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, 1978.
25.
MontagueP.HorneM. R.The behaviour of circular tubes with large openings subject to axial compression. J. Mech. Eng. Sci., 1981, 23 (5), 225–242.
26.
YehM. K.LinM. C.WuW. T.Bending buckling of an elastoplastic cylindrical shell with a cutout. Eng. Struct., 1999, 21 (11), 996–1005.
27.
SmithC. S.KirkwoodW.SwanJ. M.Buckling strength and post-collapse behaviour of tubular bracing members including damage effects. In Proceedings of BOSS79, Second International Conference on Behaviour of offshore structures, London, 1979.
28.
SmithC. S.SomervilleW. L.SwanJ. M.Compression tests on full-scale and small-scale tubular bracing members including damage effects. OT-R8079, Department of Energy, UK, 1980.
29.
TabyJ.RasheedS. M. H.Experimental investigation of the behaviour of damaged tubular members. MK/R 92, Division of Marine Structures, Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1980.
30.
RasheedS. M. H.Ultimate strength and post-ultimate strength behaviour of damaged tubular structural members. SK/R 52, Division of Marine Structures, Norwegian Institute of Technology, 1980.
31.
TabyJ.MoanT.RasheedS. M. H.Theoretical and experimental study of the behaviour of damaged tubular members in offshore structures. Norwegian Marit. Res., 1981, 9, 2.
32.
SmithC. S.Assessment of damage in offshore steel platforms. In Proceedings of International Conference on Marine safety, Glasgow, UK, September 1983.
33.
VartdalB. J.Combined loading of tubes containing a cut-out. PhD Thesis, UMIST, Manchester, 1999.
34.
GjelsvikK. E.Experimental and theoretical behaviour of slotted tubes subject to combined axial compression and bending loads as applied to toppling of structures. PhD Thesis, UMIST, Manchester, 2000.
35.
ABAQUS Version 5.6, 1997 (Hibbitt Karlsson and Sorenson, Pawtucket, RI, USA).
36.
RambergW.OsgoodW. R.Description of stress strain curves by three parameters. NACA-TN-902, 1943.
37.
ASTM, ASTM E 1152–95, Standard test method for determining J-R curves, 1995.
BrazierL. G.On the flexure of thin cylindrical shells and other ‘thin’ structures. Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1927, 116, 104–114.
40.
CalladineC. R.Theory of shell structures, 1983 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK).
41.
YuT. X.ReidS. R.WangB.Hardening-softening behaviour of tubular cantilever beams. Int. J. Mech. Sci., 1993, 35, 1021.
42.
RiceJ. R.A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J. Appl. Mech. Trans. ASME, 1968, 35, 379–386.
43.
ParisP. C.TadaH.The application of fracture proof design methods using tearing instability theory to nuclear piping postulating circumferential through-wall cracks. NUREG/CR-3464, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, September 1983.
44.
KleckerR.BrustF. W.WilkowskiG.NRC leak before break (LBB.NRC) analysis for through-wall cracked pipes under axial plus bending loads. NUREG/CR-4572, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, May 1986.
45.
IrwinG. R.KiesJ. A.SmithA. L.Fracture strength relative to onset and arrest of crack propagation. Proc. ASTM, 1958, 58, 640–660.
46.
BrustF. W.Approximate methods of fracture analysis of throughwall cracked pipes. NUREG/CR-4853, US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, February 1987.
47.
ZahoorA.A circumferential throughwall crack in a pipe subjected to combined bending and axial loading. Int. J. Pressure Vessels Piping, 1992, 51, 1.
48.
AtkinsA. G.ChenZ.CotterellB.The essential work of fracture and JR curves for the double cantilever beam specimen: An examination of elastoplastic crack propagation. Proc. R. Soc. London A, 1998, 454, 815.
49.
HancockJ. W.ReuterW. G.ParksD. M.ASTM STP 1171, 1993, p. 21 (American Society for Testing Materials, 1993).
50.
ShinC. S.WiP. L.JaoW. T.Engineering assessment methods in the prediction of elastic-plastic fracture behaviour. J. Chin. Soc. Mech. Eng., 1992, 13, 505.
51.
AtkinsA. G.CotterellB.A review of the j and I integrals and their implications for crack growth resistance and toughness in ductile fracture. Int. J. Fract., 1996, 81, 357.
