Abstract
Abstract
This paper compares the performance of three mesh movement algorithms: Laplacian smoothing, linear spring analogy and torsion spring analogy for a fluid mesh update in staggered fluid-structure interaction (FSI) simulations with a non-linear free surface. The mesh updating schemes are applied to simulate three representative cases of the above-stated dual moving boundary problem. The performances of the algorithms are gauged on the basis of their ability to delay the initiation of a complete remesh of the fluid domain while maintaining solution accuracy. To satisfy this dual objective, the mesh-updating algorithm should not only prevent mesh failure but should also maintain well-shaped triangles. The reasons for the failure of different schemes are explained and suitable modifications are suggested/implemented to enhance thier performance. It is shown that these modifications prove to be very successful in improving the effectiveness of the algorithms.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
