Improving kinematic and structural performance of Geneva mechanisms using the optimal control method

Abstract

A method is proposed to improve the performance of the conventional Geneva mechanism. Rather than driving the input crank at a uniform speed, this method uses optimal control theory to synthesize the speed of the crank. In this paper, design criteria are first developed based upon the elimination of the impact loading at the beginning and end of the motion cycle. In addition, three approaches to program the crank speed are introduced. In the first approach, the crank speed is designed to be optimal so as to minimize the output acceleration. In the second approach, the crank speed is determined by minimizing the input motor torque. The third approach uses the degree of wear between the crank pin and wheel slot as the index to optimize the crank speed. All design objectives are formulated as a parameterized optimization problem and solved via an efficient numerical method. Furthermore, trade-offs among the desired characteristics are taken into account by formulating the problem as a multiobjective optimization problem. Two examples are given to illustrate the design procedure.

Keywords

Geneva mechanism optimal control parameterized optimization multiobjective optimization

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Dijksman

E. A.

Jerk-free Geneva wheel driving. J. Mechanisms, 1966, 1, 235–283.

Bagci

Synthesis of double-crank driven mechanisms with adjustable motion and dwell time ration. Mech. Mach. Theory, 1977, 12(6), 619–638.

Dijksman

E. A.

Gear-wheel drive Geneva wheels. Rev. Roum. Sci. Techn.-Me'c. Appl., 1976, 21(4), 581–606.

Yang

A. T.

Hsia

L. M.

Multistage geared Geneva mechanism. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des., 1979, 101, 41–46.

Fenton

R. G.

Zhang

Development of a new Geneva mechanism with improved kinematic characteristics. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des., 1991, 113, 40–45.

Al-Sabeeh

A. K.

Double crank external Geneva mechanism. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des., 1993, 115, 666–670.

Fenton

R. G.

Geneva mechanisms connected in series. Trans. ASME, J. Engng for Industry, 1975, 97, 603–608.

Sadek

K. S. H.

Lloyd

J. L.

Smith

M. R.

A new design of Geneva drive to reduce shock loading. Mech. Mach. Theory, 1990, 25, 589–595.

Cheng

C. Y.

Lin

Improving dynamic performance of the Geneva mechanism using non-linear spring elements. Mech. Mach. Theory, 1995, 30, 119–129.

10.

Chew

Freudenstein

Longman

R. W.

Application of optimal control theory to the synthesis of high-speed cam-follower systems. Part 1: Optimality criterion. Trans. ASME, J. Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automn in Des., 1983, 105, 577–584.

11.

Chew

Freudenstein

Longman

R. W.

Application of optimal control theory to the synthesis of high-speed cam-follower systems. Part 2: System optimization. Trans. ASME, J. Mechanisms, Transmissions, and Automn in Des., 1983, 105, 585–591.

12.

Fabien

B. C.

Longman

R. W.

Freudenstein

The design of high-speed dwell-rise-dwell cams using linear quadratic optimal control theory. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des., 1994, 116, 867–874.

13.

Yan

H. S.

Chen

W. R.

On the output motion characteristics of variable input speed servo-controlled slider-crank mechanisms. Mech. Mach. Theory, 2000, 35, 541–561.

14.

Cuthrell

J. E.

Biegler

L. T.

On the optimization of differential-algebraic process systems. Am. Inst. Chem. Engrs J., 1987, 3, 1257–1270.

15.

Vlassenbroeck

Dooren

R. V.

A Chebyshev technique for solving nonlinear optimal control problems. IEEE Trans. Automat. Cont., 1988, 33(4), 333–340.

16.

Chew

Chuang

C. H.

Minimizing residual vibrations in high-speed cam-follower systems over a range of speeds. Trans. ASME, J. Mech. Des., 1995, 177, 166–172.

17.

Elnagar

G. N.

Kazemi

M. A.

Pseudospectral Chebyshev optimal control of constrained nonlinear dynamical systems. Comput. Optimization and Applics, 1998, 11, 190–217.

18.

Gutman

A. S.

To avoid vibration—try this new cam profile. Product Engng, 1960, 32(44), 42–48.