Conventional computational fluid dynamics (CFD) methods for simulating the flow through automotive exhaust catalysts assume a monolith resistance based on one-dimensional laminar flow. This underpredicts the flow maldistribution in the monolith. Incorporation of an additional pressure loss accounting for entrance effects improves predictions for the maximum flow velocity within the substrate.
HowittJ. S.SekellaT. C.Flow effects in monolithic honeycomb automotive catalytic converters. SAE paper 740244, 1974.
2.
WendlandD. W.KreacherJ. E.AnderseyE.Reducing catalytic converter pressure loss with enhanced inlet-header diffusion. SAE paper 952398, SP-1120, pp. 13–23, 1995.
3.
WendlandD. W.MatthesW. R.Visualization of automotive catalytic converter internal flows. SAE paper 861554, 1986.
4.
ZygourakisK.Transient operation of monolith catalytic converters: A two-dimensional reactor model and the effects of radially non-uniform flow distributions. Chem. Engng Sci., 1989, 44(9), 2075–2086.
5.
JeongS. J.KimT. H.CFD investigation of the 3-dimensional unsteady flow in the catalytic converter. SAE paper 971025, 1997.
6.
ShuaiS.-J.WangJ.-X.ZhuangR.-J.ChenJ.-R.Study on flow characteristics of automotive catalytic converters with various configurations. SAE paper 2000-01-0208, SP-1533, pp. 41–51, 2000.
7.
WeltensH.BresslerH.TerresF.NeumaierH.RammoserD.Optimisation of catalytic converter gas flow distribution by CFD. SAE paper 930780, 1993.
8.
BenjaminS. F.ClarksonR. J.HaimadN.GirgisN. S.An experimental and predictive study of the flow in axisymmetric automotive exhaust catalyst systems. SAE Trans., J. Fuels and Lubricants, 1996, 105, Sec. 4, 1008–1019.
9.
KüchemannD.WeberJ.Aerodynamics of Propulsion, 1953 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
10.
HaimadN.A theoretical and experimental investigation of the flow performance of automotive catalytic converters. PhD thesis, Coventry University, 1997.
11.
STAR-CD Users Guide; Version 3.100A, 1999 (Computational Dynamics).
