Research results in the area of ‘human reliability’ enable calculations to be made of the probability of human error, but also an acknowledgement of the ability of the human operator to recognize an unwanted process and to avoid it. Connectionism assessment of human reliability (CAHR) is a newly developed system that evaluates events, thereby making it possible to find conditions of cognitive error and develop strategies to reduce the probability of human error. It can be shown that aside from organizational measures, ergonomic improvements are of especially profound importance in the aim to optimize error management.
HelanderM.Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, 1988 (North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).
2.
RigbyL. V.The nature of human error. In 24th Annual Technical Conference of the American Society for Quality Control, 1969457–466.
3.
SträterO.Beurteilung der menschlichen Zuverlässigkeit auf der Basis von Betriebserfahrung. Dissertation an der Technischen Universität München, GRS-138, 1997 (GRS, Köln, Germany).
4.
RaschG.Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests, 1989 (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois).
5.
HannamanG. W.SpurginA. J.Human Cognitive Reliability Model for PRA Analysis, 1984, NUS-4531 (NUS-Corp., San Diego, California).
6.
ReichartG.Menschliche Zuverlässigkeit beim Führen von Kraftfahrzeugen, 2001, Fortschritt-Berichte VDI, Reihe 22 Mensch-Maschine-Systeme (VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf, Germany).
7.
SwainA. D.GuttmanH. E.Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications, 1983, NUREG/CR-1278 (Sandia National Laboratories, Washington, DC).
8.
ZimolongB.Empirical evaluation of THERP, SLIM and ranking to estimate HEPs. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1991, Vol. 35–1, p. 1 (Elsevier, Oxford).
