The paper touches on the experience gained from numerous applications of design for manufacture (DFM) techniques, across a wide range of business sectors and production volumes. It describes the benefits that have accrued in terms of part count reduction and savings in component manufacture and assembly costs. The paper also focuses on implementation strategies for DFM. It describes the way businesses have approached the issue, the problems faced, the processes involved and the planning and organizational aspects that need to be addressed in order to maximize the benefits from the technology.
MyrupM.Design for quality. PhD thesis, Institute for Engineering Design, Technical University of Denmark, IK publication 93.134A, 1993.
3.
FabryckyW. J.Modeling and indirect experimentation in system design and evaluation. J. NCOSE, 1994, 1(1), 133–144.
4.
MilesB. L.SwiftK. G.Design for manufacture and assembly. Mfg Engr, 1998, 77(5), 221–225.
5.
BoothroydG.Product design for manufacture and assembly. CADJ, 1994, 26(7), 505–519.
6.
Design for Assembly/Manufacture Analysis Practitioners' Manual, 1995 (CSC Manufacturing, Solihull).
7.
MiyakawaS.OhashiT.The Hitachi assemblability evaluation method. In Proceedings of International Conference on Product Design For Assembly, Rhode Island, 1986.
8.
BoothroydG.DewhurstP.Product Design for Assembly, 1989 (Boothroyd Dewhurst, Rhode Island).
9.
SwiftK. G.BookerJ. D.Process Selection: From Design to Manufacture, 1997 (Butterworth Heinemann).
