Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

After consideration of the original certification basis of the Airbus A300 commercial transport aircraft, this paper considers typical industry procedures for the justification of the original design service goal, during which the principal structure of the aircraft is reasonably free from significant fatigue cracking. The justification of aircraft life extension, or continued operation beyond design service goal, is then described, including the assessment of fatigue and corrosion damage accumulated during the service life of the aircraft, and the analysis of areas of the structure potentially susceptible to widespread fatigue damage. In addition, the paper discusses the use of preventative maintenance actions to ensure the continued safety of the aircraft during extended service.

Keywords

ageing aircraft continuing structural integrity widespread fatigue damage probabilistic assessment

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anon. Aircraft accident report, Aloha Airlines, flight 243, Boeing 737–200, N73711, near Maui, Hawaii, April 28, 1988. Report NTSB/AAR-89/03, National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC, June 1989.

Anon. Damage tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure. Advisory Circular 25.571–1C, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, April 1998.

Kimmins

S. T.

Lawford

Airbus A300 extended operational limits—opportunities and a proposed means of wing structure justification. In Confederation of European Aerospace Societies (CEAS) Forum on

Life Extension— Aerospace Technology Opportunities, Cambridge, March 1999; also in Proceedings, The Royal Aeronautical Society, London, 1999, pp. 2.1–2.9.

Anon. Supplemental structural inspection program for large transport category airplanes. Advisory Circular AC/91–56, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, May 1981.

Anon. Damage-tolerance and fatigue evaluation of structure. Federal Aviation Regulations, Section 25.571, Amendment 25–96, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, March 1998.

Schmidt

H.-J.

Beaufils

J. Y.

Atmur

Cummins

Jongebreur

Watanabe

Shewmaker

Final report of the Airworthiness Assurance Working Group industry committee on widespread fatigue damage. Report, Airworthiness Assurance Working Group, Transport Airplane and Engine Issues Group, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, July 1993.

Maclin

J. R.

Performance of fuselage pressure structure, In Third International Conference on

Aging Aircraft and Structural Airworthiness, Washington, DC, November 1991; also in NASA Conference Publication 3160, edited by C. E. Harris, 1992, pp. 67–74 (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC).

McGuire

Foucault

Recommendations for regulatory action to prevent widespread fatigue damage in the commercial airplane fleet. Report, Airworthiness Assurance Working Group, Transport Airplane and Engine Issues Group, Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, March 1999.

Jones

M. R.

Civil airframe structural integrity—some probabilistic aspects of risk assessment. Proc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part G, Journal of Aerospace Engineering, 1995, 210 (Gl), 19–25.

10.

Anon. Continuing structural integrity program for large transport category airplanes. Advisory Circular 91–56A, Federal Aviation Administration, Washington, DC, April 1998, Appendix 2, pp. A2–A3.

Ensuring the continued structural airworthiness of the Airbus A300 commercial transport aircraft

Abstract

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References