The problem of minimizing stress concentrations in machinery components is formulated as one of unconstrained minimization by incorporating all ‘side’ constraints on design variables by use of penalty functions. Design parameters describing the transition are determined for an optimal fillet in a tension bar, as well as for a piston-rod ‘eye’. The procedure is generally applicable.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ZienkiewiczO. C.The finite element method in engineering science1971 (McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc., New York and London).
2.
ZienkiewiczO. C.IronsB. M.ErgatoudisJ. G.AhmadS.ScottF. C.‘Isoparametric and associated element families for two and three dimensional analysis’, Proc. Course on finite element methods in stress analysis (Edited by HolandI.BellK.) 1969 (Trondheim Technical University).
3.
IronsB. M.ZienkiewiczO. C.‘The isoparametric finite element system - a new concept in finite element analysis’, Proc. Cons. recent advances in stress analysis, Royal Aero. Soc. 1968 (Royal Aeronautical Society, London).
4.
ZienkiewiczO. C.CampbellJ. S.‘Shape optimization and sequential linear programming’, Chapter 7 ofOptimum structure design (Edited by GallagherR. H.ZienkiewiczO. C.) 1973 (John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York and Chichester).
5.
RamakrishnanC. V.CampbellJ. S.‘Automated design of structural shapes’, Int. Conf. computer orlented design1973 (University of Aston in Birmingham).
6.
VitielloE.‘Shape optimization using mathematical programming and modelling techniques’, 2nd AGARD Conf. Optimization of Structures1973 (Milan).
7.
DavidonW. C.‘Variable metric method for minimization’, Argonna Nathn. Lab. ANL-5990 Prev. University of Chicago (1959).
8.
FletcherR.PowellM. J. P.‘A rapidly convergent discrete method for minimization’, Comput. J.19636, 163–8.
9.
NeuberH.HahnH. G.‘Stress concentration in scientific research and engineering’, Appl. Mech. Rev.19131, 1966, 107–99.
10.
BabuskaI.KautskyJ.Optimization of notch shapes, ZAMM 4319631 (2), 47–54.
11.
NeuberH.‘Der zugbeanspruchte Flachstab mit optimalem Querschnittsubergang’, Forsch. Geb. IngWes.35, 196929–30.
12.
TvergaardV.‘On the optimum snape of a fillet in a flat bar with restrictions’, 1973 Report No. 55, pp. 1–24 of Danish centre for applied mathematics and mechanics.
13.
PetersonR. E.Stress concentration design factors1953 (John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York and Chichester).
14.
FletcherR.‘Mathematical programming methods - a critical review’, Chapter 5 ofOptimum structural design, see (4).
15.
FiaccoA. V.MccormickG. P.‘Non-linear programming, sequential unconstrained minimization techniques’, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1968.
16.
MoeJ.‘Penalty function methods’, Chapter 9 ofOptimal structural design, see (4).
17.
KavlieD.Optimum design of statically indeterminate structures1971 Thesis submitted to the University of California, Berkeley, for the degree of Ph.D.
18.
FrancavillaA.ZienkiewiczO. C.‘A note on numerical computation of elastic contact problems’, Research Report, University of Wales, Swansea C/R/214/74 (1974).
19.
NewtonD. A.ScholesA.‘Computer aided optimal design of diesel engine pistons’, A.S.M.E. paper 70-DCP-6 (1970).