In this study, the numerical procedure for the three-dimensional finite element analysis of shell intersections is presented. The paper includes a description of the modified mixed variational formulation, a model of an eight-node three-dimensional finite element and a computer program for stress analysis of the intersecting shells. The comparison of stress results obtained using the three-dimensional computer program with experimental data is given. The results of a comparative study of the three-dimensional and two-dimensional finite element analyses for stress distribution in the intersection region and the maximum effective stress are presented for normally intersecting cylindrical shells under internal pressure loading.
ReidelbachW.The state of stress at the perpendicular intersection of two right circular tubesIngenier-Archiv1961, 30 (5), 293–316.
2.
EringenA. C.SuhubiE.Stress distribution at two normally intersecting cylindrical shellsNucl. Engng Des., 1965, 1 (2), 253–270.
3.
HansberryJ. W.JonesN.A theoretical study of the elastic behavior of two normally intersecting cylindrical shellsTrans. ASME, J. Engng Industry, 1969, 3, 563–572.
4.
XueM. D.HwangK. C.LuW.ChenW.A reinforcement design method based on analysis of large openings in cylindrical pressure vesselsTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1996, 118 (4), 502–506.
5.
TaylorC. E.LindN. C.Photoelastic study of the stresses near openings in pressure vessels. Welding Research Council Bulletin113, 1966.
6.
LevenM. M.Photoelastic determination of the stresses in reinforced openings in pressure vessels. Welding Research Council Bulletin113, 1966.
7.
CorumJ. M.GreenstreetW. L.Experimental elastic stress analysis of cylindrical-to-cylindrical shell models and comparisons with theoretical predictions. In Proceedings of the International Conference onStructural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, Germany, 1971, Vol.3(G), pp. 1–24.
8.
GwaltneyR. C.CorumJ. M.BoltS. E.BrysonJ. W.Experimental stress analysis of cylinder-to-cylinder shell models and comparisons with theoretical predictionsTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1976, 98, 283–290.
9.
MoffatD. G.Experimental stress analysis of four fabricated equal diameter branch intersections subjected to moment loadings and the implications on branch junctions designProc. Instn Mech. Engrs, Part A, Journal of Power and Energy, 1985, 199 (A4), 261–284.
10.
MershonJ. L.Interpretive report on oblique nozzle connections in pressure vessel heads and shells under internal pressure loading. Welding Research Council Bulletin153, 1970.
11.
RodabaughE. C.Review of data relevant to the design of tubular joints for use in fixed offshore platforms. Welding Research Council Bulletin256, 1980.
12.
MershonJ. L.MokhtarainK.RanjanG. V.RodabaughE. C.Local stresses in cylindrical shells due to external loadings on nozzles. Welding Research Council Bulletin297, 1984.
13.
MokhtarainK.EndicottJ. S.Stresses in intersecting cylinders subjected to pressure. Welding Research Council Bulletin368, 1991.
14.
BassB. R.BrysonJ. M.MooreS. E.Validation of the finite element stress analysis computer program CORTES-SA for analyzing piping tees and pressure vessel nozzles. InPressure Vessel and Piping Computer Program Evaluation and Qualification, Proceedings of the Energy Technology Conference, 1977, pp. 9–25.
15.
KhanA. S.ChenJ.HsiaoC.WoodsG.A comparative study of the stress field around a reinforced and an unreinforced normal intersection of two cylindrical shellsInt. J. Pressure Vessel Piping, 1984, 15, 79–92.
16.
KirkwoodM. G.CarmichaelG. D.T.MoffatD. G.Finite element stress analysis of an equal diameter branch pipe intersections subjected to out-of-plane and twisting momentsJ. Strain Analysis, 1986, 21 (1), 9–16.
17.
NatarajanR.WideraG. E.O.AfshariP.A finite element model to analyze cylinder-cylinder intersectionsTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1987, 109 (4), 411–418.
18.
MoffatD. G.MwenifumboJ. A. M.XuS. H.MistryJ.Effective stress factors for piping branch junctions due to internal pressure and external moment loadsJ. Strain Analysis, 1991, 26 (2), 85–101.
19.
HellenI. K.MoneyH. A.The application of three-dimensional finite elements to a cylinder-cylinder intersectionInt. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 1970, 2, 415–418.
20.
RashidV. R.GilmanJ. D.Three-dimensional analysis of reactor vessel nozzles (summary). In Proceedings of the International Conference onStructural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Berlin, Germany, 1971, Vol.4 (G), pp. 1–15.
21.
BrownS. J.HaizlipL. D.NielsenJ. M.ReedS. E.Analytical and experimental stress analysis of a cylinder-to-cylinder structureTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1977, 99 (11), 575–583.
22.
RajuP. P.Development of stress indices for 45° lateral connections. In Proceedings of the Joint Conference onPressure Vessels and Piping, Materials, Nuclear Engineering, Denver, Colorado, 1981, Vol.50, pp. 21–33.
23.
ChenH. C.SchnobrichW. C.Nonlinear Analysis of Intersecting Cylinders by the Finite Element Method, 1976 (Urbana, Illinois).
24.
PanagiotopoulosG. D.A finite element procedure for the stress analysis of tubular joint connectionsInt. J. Numer. Meth. Engng, 1986, 23, 317–329.
25.
KovesW. J.NairS.A finite element for the analysis of shell intersectionsTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1996, 118 (4), 399–406.
26.
SkopinskyV. N.Numerical stress analysis of intersecting cylindrical shellsTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1993, 115 (3), 275–282.
27.
SkopinskyV. N.BerkovN. A.Stress analysis of ellipsoidal shell with nozzle under internal pressure loadingTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1994, 116 (3), 431–436.
28.
SkopinskyV. N.Stress analysis of nonradial cylindrical shell intersections subjected to external loadingInt. J. Pressure Vessel Piping, 1996, 67 (2), 145–153.
29.
SkopinskyV. N.Stress analysis of shell intersections with torus transition under internal pressure loadingTrans. ASME, J. Pressure Vessel Technol., 1997, 119 (3), 288–292.
PalusamyS. S. et al. Comparison of three-dimensional finite element and photoelastic results for lateral connection, WC-12B2. Welding Research Council Bulletin251, 1979.
32.
PianT. H. H.Finite element models by variational principles with relaxed continuity requirementVariational Meth. Engng, 1972, 1 (3), 1–24.
33.
ZienkiewiczO. C.NakazawaS.On variational formulation and its modifications for numerical solutionComputers Structs, 1984, 19 (1–2), 303–313.
34.
NovozhilovV. V.Theory of Elasticity, 1958 (Shipbuilding, Leningrad).
35.
ZienkiewiczO. C.TaylorR. L.The Finite Element Method, Vol. 1, 4th edition, 1989 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
36.
TimoshenkoS. P.GoodierJ. N.Theory of Elasticity, 3rd edition, 1970 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
SkopinskyV. N.ChizhovV. F.Analytical study of cylindrical shell deformation with arbitrary boundary conditionsIn Strength and Durability of Structures, 1980, pp. 64–73.
39.
TimoshenkoS. P.Woinowsky-KriegerS.Theory of Plates and Shells, 2nd edition, 1959 (McGraw-Hill, New York).
