This study examined the opinions of more than 300 primary teachers. The first purpose of the study was to investigate the reported frequency with which teachers used various beginning reading materials (e.g., literature, basals, workbooks, predictable text, leveled text, decodable text, and vocabulary-controlled text). The second purpose of the study was to inspect how instructional purposes, state text policies, programs, grade levels, and freedom of choice influenced reported uses. The results suggested that teachers of beginning readers use many different types of materials and are guided primarily by instructional purposes rather than programs or grade levels. Teachers reported using decodable text and literature for very particular instructional purposes but reportedly used other materials less specifically. Respondents in states with strong text mandates, like Texas and California, did differ from respondents in other states. In sum, the results suggested that teachers believed that different materials can serve different purposes with different readers.
References
1.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AllingtonR. (1997, August-September). Overselling phonics: Five unscientific assertions about reading instruction. Reading Today, 15, 15.
3.
AllingtonR. (2005, June-July). The other five “pillars” of effective reading instruction. Reading Today, 22, 3.
4.
AllingtonR.Woodside-JironH. (1998). Decodable text in beginning reading: Are mandates and policy based on research?ERS Spectrum, 16, 3–13.
5.
AlreckP. L.SettleR. B. (1995). The survey research handbook (2nd ed.). Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin.
6.
Barksdale-LaddM. A.ThomasK. F. (1993). Eight teachers' reported pedagogical dependence on basal readers. Elementary School Journal, 94, 49–72.
7.
BarrR.DuffyG. (1978, March). The evolution of a research study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Toronto, Canada.
8.
BaumannJ. F. (1993). Basal reading programs and the deskilling ofteachers: A critical examination of the argument. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 390–398.
9.
BaumannJ. F.HeubachK. (1996). Do basal readers deskill teachers? A national survey of educators' use and opinions of basals. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 511–526.
10.
BaumannJ. F.HoffmanJ. V.Duffy-HesterA.RoJ. M. (2000). “The First R”—Yesterday and today: U.S. elementary reading instruction practices reported by teachers and administrators. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 338–377.
11.
BaumannJ. F.HoffmanJ. V.MoonJ.Duffy-HesterA. (1998). Where are teachers' voices in the phonics/whole language debate? Results from a survey of U.S. elementary classroom teachers. The Reading Teacher, 51, 636–650.
12.
BeckI. L. (1997, August-September). Response to “Overselling phonics”. Reading Today, 15, 15.
13.
BloomfieldL.BarnhartC. L. (1961). Let's read, a linguistic approach. Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press.
14.
BrabhamE. G.VillaumeS. K. (2002). Leveled text: The good news and the bad news. The Reading Teacher, 55, 438–442.
15.
BridgeC. A.BurtonB. (1982). Teaching sight vocabulary through patterned language materials. In NilesJ. A.HarrisL. A. (Eds.), New inquiries reading research and instruction: 31st yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 119–123). Washington, DC: National Reading Conference.
16.
BrownK. (1999). What kind of text—For whom and when? Textual scaffolding for beginning readers. The Reading Teacher, 53, 292–307.
17.
California Department of Education. (1999). 1999–2002 K–8 reading/language arts/English language development adoption criteria. Sacramento, CA: Author.
18.
California English/Language Arts Committee. (1987). English-language arts framework for California public schools (kindergarten through grade twelve). Sacramento: California Department of Education.
19.
CarnineD. W.SilbertJ.Kame'enuiE. J.TraverS. G. (2004). Direct instruction in reading (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
CassidyJ.CassidyD. (2003, December-January). What's hot, what's not for 2003. Reading Today, 20, 1.
21.
ChallJ. (1967). Learning to read: The great debate. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
ClayM. M. (1985). The early detection of reading difficulties. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
23.
ColeA. (1998). Beginner-oriented texts in literature-based classrooms: The segue for a few struggling readers. The Reading Teacher, 51, 488–501.
24.
CommeyrasM.DeGroffL. (1998). Literacy professionals' perspectives on professional development and pedagogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 434–472.
25.
ComptonD. L.AppletonA. C.HospM. K. (2004). Exploring the relationship between text-leveling systems and reading accuracy and fluency in second grade students who are average and poor decoders. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19, 176–184.
26.
CunninghamP. M.AllingtonR. L. (1991). Words, letters, sounds, and big books: A beary good approach. Learning, 20(2), 91–92.
27.
CunninghamP. M.HallD. P.DefeeM. (1991). Nonability grouped, multilevel instruction: A year in a first grade classroom. The Reading Teacher, 44, 566–571.
28.
CunninghamJ. W.SpadorciaS. A.EricksonK.KoppenhaverD. A.SturmJ. M.YoderD. E. (2005). Investigating the instructional supportiveness of leveled texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 410–427.
29.
DanielsH.ZemelmanS.BizarM. (1999). Whole language works: Sixty years of research. Educational Leadership, 57(2), 32–37.
30.
de VausD. (2002). Surveys in social research (5th ed.). London: Routledge.
31.
DillmanD. (2002). Mail and internet surveys: A tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
32.
Dudley-MaringC.MurphyS. (2001). Changing the way we think about language arts. Language Arts, 78, 574–578.
FoormanB. R.FrancisD. J.DavidsonK. C.HarmM. W.GriffinJ. (2004). Variability in text feature in six grade 1 basal reading programs. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 167–197.
35.
FountasI.PinnellG. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
36.
FountasI.PinnellG. S. (1999). Matching texts and readers: Using leveled texts in grades K-3. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
37.
FountasI.PinnellG. S. (2002). Leveled books for readers, grades 3–6: A companion volume for guiding readers and writers. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
38.
FreemanY. S. (1997). California's reading revolution: What happened?New Advocate, 10(10), 31–47.
39.
FreschM. J. (2001). A national survey of spelling instruction: Investigating teachers' beliefs and practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 819–848.
40.
GatesA. I.RussellD. H. (1938). Types of materials, vocabulary burden, word analysis, and other factors in beginning reading. The Elementary School Journal, 39, 27–35.
41.
GoveM. K. (1983). Clarifying teachers' beliefs about reading. The Reading Teacher, 37, 261–268.
42.
GuthrieJ. (1979). Research views: Vocabulary control. The Reading Teacher, 33, 240–242.
43.
HarrisT. L.HodgesR. E. (1995). The literacy dictionary. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
44.
HarsteJ.BurkeC. L. (1977). A new hypothesis for reading teacher research: Both teaching and learning of reading are theoretically based. In PearsonP. D. (Ed.), Reading theory, research, and practice: 26th yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 32–40). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
45.
Heald-TaylorG. (1987). How to use predictable books for K-2 language arts instruction. The Reading Teacher, 40, 656–661.
46.
HibbertK.IannacciL. (2005). From dissemination to discernment: The commodifcation of literacy instruction and the fostering of “good teacher consumerism”. The Reading Teacher, 58, 716–727.
47.
HicksC. P.VillaumeS. K. (2000). Finding our own way: Critical reflections of literacy development of two Reading Recovery children. The Reading Teacher, 54, 398–412.
48.
HiebertE. (1998). Text matters in learning to read. (CIERA Rep. No. 1–001). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
49.
HiebertE.FisherC. W. (April, 2002). Text matters in developing fluent reading. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
50.
HiebertE.MenonM.MartinL. (2006). Are there alternatives in beginning reading textbooks? An examination of three beginning reading textbooks. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 21, 5–20.
51.
HiebertE.MesmerH. A. (2006). Perspectives on the difficulty of beginning reading texts. In DickinsonD.NeumanS. (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
52.
HirschE. D. (1999). Core knowledge sequence: Content guidelines for grades K-8 (Rev. ed.). Charlottesville, VA: Core Knowledge Foundation.
53.
HoffmanJ. V. (2002). WORDs (on words in leveled texts for beginning readers). In SchallertD.FairbanksC. M.WorthyJ.MalochB.HoffmanJ. V. (Eds.), 51st yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 59–81). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
54.
HoffmanJ. V.McCartheyS. J.AbbottJ.ChristianC.CormanL.CurryC.. (1993). So what's new in the new basals? A focus on first grade. Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 47–73.
55.
HoffmanJ. V.RoserN. L.SalasR.PattersonE.PenningtonJ. (2001). Text leveling and little books in first grade. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 507–528.
56.
HoffmanJ. V.SailorsM.PattersonJ. (2003). Decodable texts for beginning reading instruction: The year 2000 basals (CIERA Rep. No. 1–016). Retrieved December 20, 2003, from http://www.ciera.org/library/reports/.
57.
HoldawayD. (1979). The foundations of literacy. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
58.
HuckC.HeplerS.HickmanJ.KieferB. (2001). Children's literature in the elementary school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
59.
International Reading Association. (2000). Making a difference means making it different: Honoring children's rights to excellent reading instruction. Newark, DE: Author.
60.
JenkinsJ.PeytonJ. A.SandersE. A.VadasyP. (2004). Effects of decodable texts in supplemental first grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 53–83.
61.
JenkinsJ.VadasyP.PeytonJ. A.SandersE. A. (2003). Decodable text: Where to find it. The Reading Teacher, 57, 185–188.
62.
JohnstonF. (1998). The reader, the text, and the task: Learning words in first grade. The Reading Teacher, 51, 666–667.
63.
JohnstonF. (2000). Word learning in predictable text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 248–255.
64.
JuelC.Roper-SchneiderD. (1985). The influence of basal readers on first grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 134–152.
65.
Kame'enuiE. J.SimmonsD. C. (1997, October-November). Decodable texts and language of dichotomy: A response to Allington. Reading Today, 15, 18.
66.
MathesP. G.DentonC. A.FletcherJ. M.AnthonyJ. L.FrancisD. J.SchatschneiderC. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–182.
67.
MenonS.HiebertE. H. (2005). A comparison of first graders' reading with little books or literature-based basal anthologies. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 12–38.
68.
MesmerH. A. (2005). What is driving basal adoptions? Unpublished manuscript.
69.
MesmerH. A. (1999). Scaffolding a crucial transition using texts with some decodability. The Reading Teacher, 53, 130–142.
70.
MesmerH. A. (2001a). Decodable text: A review of what we know. Reading Research and Instruction, 40, 462–483.
71.
MesmerH. A. (2001b). Examining the theoretical claims about decodable text: Does text decodability lead to greater application of letter/sound knowledge in first grade readers? In SchallertD.FairbanksC. M.WorthyJ.MalochB.HoffmanJ. V. (Eds.) The yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 462–483). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
72.
MesmerH. A. (2005). Decodable text and the first grade reader. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 2, 61–86.
73.
MesmerH. A.GriffithP. (2005-2006). Everybody's selling it but just what is explicit, systematic phonics instruction?Reading Teacher, 59, 366–376.
74.
National Center on Education and the Economy. (1998). The new standards. Washington, DC: Author.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. (2005). Onward to excellence. Retrieved January 3, 2005, from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/ote/on.
77.
PressleyM.YokoiL.Wharton-McDonaldR.MistrettaJ. (1997). Survey of the instructional practices of grade 5 teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 145–160.
78.
RashotteC.TorgesonJ. K. (1985). Repeated reading and reading fluency in learning disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 180–188.
79.
RichardsonV.AndersP.TidwellD. (1991). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices in reading comprehension. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 559–586.
80.
RogL. J.BurtonW. (2002). Matching texts and readers: Leveling early reading materials for assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 55, 348–357.
ShannonP. (1983). The use of commercial reading materials in American elementary schools. Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 185–198.
83.
ShannonP. (1987). Commercial reading materials, a technological ideology, and the deskilling of teachers. Elementary School Journal, 87, 307–329.
84.
ShannonP.GoodmanK., (Eds.). (1994). Basal readers: A second look. Katonah, NY: Richard C. Owen.
85.
SlavinR. E.MaddenN. A.DolanL. J.WasikB. A. (1996). Every child, every school: Success for all. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
86.
SnowC.BurnsM. S.GriffinP. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences Press.
87.
StahlS. A.Duffy-HesterA.StahlK. A. D. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but were afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 338–355.
88.
SteinM.JohnsonB.GutlohnL. (1999). Analyzing beginning reading programs: The relationship between decoding instruction and text. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 257–287.
89.
StevensJ. (1999). Intermediate statistics: A modern approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
90.
StricklandD. S.MorrowL. M. (1990). Sharing big books (Emerging readers and writers). The Reading Teacher, 43, 342–343.
91.
Texas Education Agency. (1990). Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on textbooks (Proclamation 68). Austin, TX: Author.
92.
Texas Education Agency. (1997). 1997 Proclamation of the State Board of Education advertising for bids on instructional materials. Austin, TX: Author.
ThorndikeE. L. (1921). Teacher's word book. New York: Teachers College Press.
95.
VadasyP. F.SandersE. A.PeytonJ. A. (2005). Relative effectiveness of reading practice or word-level instruction in supplemental tutoring: How text matters. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 364–382.
96.
WatsonD. (1997). Beyond decodable texts, supportive and workable literature. Language Arts, 7, 635–644.
97.
WorthyJ.MoormanM.TurnerM. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 12–27.
