This qualitative study uses an analysis of literature circle discussions to illuminate larger issues of gender and social class for a group of fifth-grade students. By examining how four students were positioned and positioned themselves within these literature conversations, I demonstrate that the roles reproduced certain gender-and class-specific storylines. These storylines served to empower the girls' literacy development, while simultaneously disempowering the literacy development of the boys. I draw upon positioning (Davies & Harre, 1990), voicing (Bakhtin, 1986), and power (Foucault, 1977) as lenses to analyze the students' discussions of literature. I then connect these discussions to larger cultural storylines in order to demonstrate the connection between these small literature circles and greater gender and social class influences.
References
1.
AlmasiJ. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314–351.
2.
AlvermannD. E.Peyton-YoungJ.WeaverD.MooreD. W.PhelpsS. F.ThrashE. C. (1996). Middle and high school students' perceptions of how they experience text-based discussions: A multicase study. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 244–267.
3.
AnyonJ. (1980). Social class and the hidden curriculum of work. Journal of Education, 162, 67–92.
4.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (EmersonC.HolquistM.LiapunovV., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
5.
BourdieuP. (1977). The economics of linguistic exchange. Social Science Information, 16, 645–668.
6.
CazdenC. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
CherlandM. R. (1994). Private practices: Girls' reading fiction and constructing identity.Bristol, PA: Taylor & Francis.
8.
ClarkeL. W. (2004, January). Gender, class and talk. Paper presented at the annual conference on Interdisciplinary Qualitative Studies, Athens, GA.
9.
DanielsH. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups (2nd ed.). Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
10.
DaviesB.HarreR. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20(1), 43–63.
11.
DutroE. (2003). “Us boys like to read football and boy stuff: Reading masculinities, performing boyhood. Journal of Literacy Research, 34, 465–500.
12.
EedsM.WellsD. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 4–29.
13.
EvansK. (1996a). A closer look at literature discussion groups: The influence of gender on student response and discourse. The New Advocate, 9, 183–196.
14.
EvansK. (1996b). Creating spaces for equity? The role of positioning in peer-led literature discussions. Language Arts, 73, 194–202.
15.
EvansK. (2001). Literature discussion groups in the intermediate grades: Dilemmas and possibilities.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16.
EvansK. (2002). Fifth-grade students' perceptions of how they experience literature discussion groups. Reading Research Quarterly, 37, 46–69.
17.
EvansK.AlvermannD.AndersP. L. (1998). Literature discussion groups: An examination of gender roles. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 107–122.
18.
FaircloughN. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language.Essex, England: Longman.
19.
FaircloughN. (2001). Language and power (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
20.
FoucaultM. (1977). Power and knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings.New York: Pantheon.
21.
FreireP.MacedoD. (1987). Reading the word and the world.Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
22.
GambrellL. (2004). Shifts in the conversation: Teacher-led, peer-led and computer-mediated discussions. The Reading Teacher, 58, 212–215.
23.
GoatleyV. J.BrockC. H.RaphaelT. E. (1995). Diverse learners participating in regular education “book clubs.”Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 352–380.
24.
HeathS. B. (1983). Ways with words: Language, life, and work in communities and classrooms.New York: Cambridge University Press.
25.
HicksD. (2004). Coming of age in working-poor America: Lessons from ethnography and teaching. In StricklandD.AlvermannD. E. (Eds.), Bridging the literacy achievement gap: Grades 4–12 (pp. 30–42). New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
HinchmanK. A.Peyton-YoungJ. (2001). Speaking but not being heard: Two adolescents negotiate classroom talk about text. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 243–268.
27.
JanksH. (2001). Identity and conflict in the critical literacy classroom. In ComberB.SimpsonA. (Eds.), Negotiating critical literacies in classrooms (pp. 137–150). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
28.
KenwayJ.KraackA. (2004). Reordering work and destabilizing masculinity. In DolbyN.DimitriadisG. (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 95–109). New York: Routledge Falmer.
29.
LewisC. (1998). Literacy interpretation as a social act. Journal of Adolescence and Adult Literacy, 42, 116–120.
30.
LewisC. (2001). Literary practices as social acts: Power, status, and cultural norms in the classroom.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31.
MarksT. (1995). Gender differences in third graders' oral discourse during peer-led literature discussion. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
32.
MeadA. (2003). Girl of Kosovo.New York: Yearling.
33.
NystrandM.GamoranA.HeckM. J. (1993). Using small groups for response to and thinking about literature. English Journal, 82, 14–22.
34.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
35.
Payne-BourcyL.Chandler-OlcottK. (2003). Spotlighting social class: An exploration of one adolescent's language and literacy practices. Journal of Literacy Research, 35, 551–590.
36.
PhelpsS.WeaverD. (1999). Public and personal voice in adolescents' classroom talk. Journal of Literacy Research, 31, 321–354.
37.
RosenblattL. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work.Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
38.
SweigartW. (1991). Classroom talk, knowledge development and writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 469–493.
39.
WagnerT. (2000). Urban Appalachian school children: The least understood of all.Cincinnati, OH: Urban Appalachian Council.
WalkerdineV.LuceyH.MelodyJ. (2001). Growing up girl: Psychosocial explorations of gender and class.New York: New York University Press.
42.
WeisL. (1990). Working class without work: High school students in a de-industrialized economy.New York: Routledge Falmer.
43.
WeisL. (2004). Revisiting a 1980's “moment of critique”: Class, gender and the new economy. In DolbyN.DimitriadisG. (Eds.), Learning to labor in new times (pp. 111–132). New York: Routledge Falmer.
44.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs.New York: Columbia University Press.
45.
WorthamS. (2001). Narratives in action: A strategy for research and analysis.New York: Teachers College Press.
