This study investigated the relationship of student-generated questions and prior knowledge with reading comprehension. A questioning hierarchy was developed to describe the extent to which student-generated questions seek different levels of conceptual understanding. Third-and fourth-grade students (N = 360) posed questions that were related to their prior knowledge and reading comprehension, measured as conceptual knowledge built from text. The results indicated that student questioning accounted for a significant amount of variance in students' reading comprehension, after accounting for the contribution of prior knowledge. Furthermore, low-and high-level questions were differentially associated with low and high levels of conceptual knowledge gained from text, showing a clear alignment between questioning levels and reading comprehension levels.
References
1.
AlaoS.GuthrieJ. T. (1999). Predicting conceptual understanding with cognitive and motivational variables. The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 243–253.
2.
ChampagneA. B.KlopferL. E.DesenaA. T.SquiresD. A. (1981). Structural representations of students' knowledge before and after science instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 97–111.
3.
ChiM. T. H.de LeeuwN.ChiuM. H. (1994). Eliciting self-explanations improves understanding. Cognitive Science, 18, 439–477.
4.
CohenR. (1983). Self-generated questions as an aid to reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 36, 770–775.
5.
CollinsA.BrownJ. S.NewmanS. E. (1990). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In ResnickL. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6.
CostaJ.CaldeiraH.GallasteguiJ. R.OteroJ. (2000). An analysis of question asking on scientific texts explaining natural phenomena. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 602–614.
7.
Cuccio-SchirripaS.SteinerE. H. (2000). Enhancement and analysis of science question level for middle school students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 210–224.
8.
DaveyB.McBrideS. (1986). Effects of question-generation training on reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 256–262.
9.
DreherM. J.GambrellL. B. (1985). Teaching children to use a self-questioning strategy for studying expository prose. Reading Improvement, 22, 2–7.
10.
EzellH. K.KohlerF. W.JarzynkaM.StrainP. S. (1992). Use of peer-assisted procedures to teach QAR reading comprehension strategies to third-grade children. Education and Treatment of Children, 15, 205–227.
11.
GraesserA. C.ClarkL. F. (1985). Structures and procedures of implicit knowledge.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12.
GraesserA. C.LangstonM. C.BaggetW. B. (1993). Exploring information about concepts by asking questions. In NakamuraG. V.MedinD. (Eds.), Categorization by humans and machines (pp. 411–436). Orlando, FL: Academic.
13.
GraesserA. C.McMahenC. L.JohnsonB. K. (1994). Question asking and answering. In GernsbacherM. A. (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 517–538). San Diego, CA: Academic.
14.
GuthrieJ. T.ScafiddiN. T. (2004). Reading comprehension for information text: Theoretical meanings, developmental patterns, and benchmarks for instruction. In GuthrieJ. T.WigfieldA.PerencevichK. C. (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 225–248). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
15.
KingA. (1994). Autonomy and question asking: The role of personal control in guided student-generated questioning. Learning and Individual Differences, 6, 163–185.
16.
KingA.RosenshineB. (1993). Effects of guided cooperative questioning on children's knowledge construction. Journal of Experimental Education, 61, 127–148.
17.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
18.
MacGregorK. (1988). Use of self-questioning with a computer-mediated text system and measures of reading performance. Journal of Reading Behavior, 20, 131–148.
19.
MiyakeN.NormanD. A. (1979). To ask a question one must know enough to know what is not known. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 357–364.
20.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read—An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Jessup, MD: National Institute for Literacy.
21.
NolteR. Y.SingerH. (1985). Active comprehension: Teaching a process of reading comprehension and its effects on reading achievement. The Reading Teacher, 39, 24–31.
22.
OlsonG. M.DuffyS. A.MackR. L. (1985). Question asking as a component of text comprehension. In GraesserA. C.BlackJ. B. (Eds.), The psychology of questions (pp. 219–226). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
23.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
24.
RaphaelT. E.PearsonP. D. (1985). Increasing students' awareness of sources of information for answering questions. American Educational Research Journal, 22, 217–236.
25.
ResnickL. B.KlopferL. E. (1989). Toward the thinking curriculum: Concluding remarks. In ResnickL. B.KlopferL. E. (Eds.), Toward the thinking curriculum: Current cognitive research (Yearbook for the Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, pp. 206–211). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
26.
ReynoldsR. E.AndersonR. C. (1982). Influence of questions on the allocation of attention during reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 623–632.
27.
RosenshineB.MeisterC.ChapmanS. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.
28.
ScardamaliaM.BereiterC. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9, 177–199.
29.
SingerH. (1978). Active comprehension: From answering to asking questions. The Reading Teacher, 31, 901–908.
30.
SingerH.DonlanD. (1982). Active comprehension: Problem-solving schema with question generation for comprehension of complex short stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 166–185.
31.
TaboadaA.GuthrieJ. T. (2004). Growth of cognitive strategies for reading comprehension. In GuthrieJ. T.WigfieldA.PerencevichK. C. (Eds.), Motivating reading comprehension: Concept-oriented reading instruction (pp. 273–306). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
32.
TaylorB. M.FryeB. J. (1992). Comprehension strategy instruction in the intermediate grades. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 39–48.
33.
TrabassoT.SeccoT.van den BroekP. W. (1984). Causal cohesion and story coherence. In MandlH.SteinN. L.TrabassoT. (Eds.), Learning and comprehension of text (pp. 83–111). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34.
van den BroekP.KremerK. E. (2000). The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading. In TaylorB. M.GravesM. F.van den BroekP. (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 1–31). New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
van den BroekP.TzengY.RisdenK.TrabassoT.BascheP. (2001). Inferential questioning: Effects on comprehension of narrative texts as a function of grade and timing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 521–529.
36.
Van der MeijH. (1990). Question asking: To know that you do not know is not enough. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 505–512.
37.
WittrockM. C. (1981). Reading comprehension. In PirozzoloF. J.WittrockM. C. (Eds.), Neuropsychological and cognitive processes in reading (pp. 229–259). New York: Academic.
