This is an inductive case study of a European-American fourth-grade girl who struggled with print-based aspects of literacy. The study highlights her multiple levels of competency as she participated over time in a heterogeneous literature discussion group that read and responded to three culturally diverse novels. Data include 27 audio-taped literature discussions, observational field notes, audio-taped interviews and presentations, and written artifacts. Grounded in social constructivist theory, this research documents one reader's non-linear movement from a literacy club outsider to shifting positions as a less-capable member in need of support, a capable peer operating solidly within her zone of proximal development, and a more capable peer working at her actual development level. She supported others' understandings by challenging group members to understand characters' situations, voicing non-stereotypic or antiracist thinking, and connecting self and others to the emotional power of prose. Questioning deficit models of reading and static labels for achievement, this study provides evidence of the contextual nature of displays of literacy competence. Implications focus on the conditions of the learning environment that supported an inclusion model of literature-based reading pedagogy.
References
1.
AllenJ. (2002). With the best intentions: Agents, impetus, and consequences of placement decisions. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 18, 39–66.
2.
AllenJ.MöllerK. J.StroupD. (2003). “Is this some kind of soap opera?”: A tale of two readers across four literature discussion contexts. Reading, Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 589–595.
3.
AllingtonR. L. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching struggling readers: Articles from “The Reading Teacher.”Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
4.
BlockA. A. (2000). Resisting occupation, resisting reading. Language Arts, 78, 129–137.
5.
BloomeD.KatzL. (1997). Literacy as social practice and classroom chronotypes. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 113, 205–222.
6.
BrownM. W. (1994). The runaway bunny.Torrence, CA: Frank Schaffer Publications.
7.
BruchacJ. (1998). The heart of a chief.New York: Dial.
8.
CairneyT.LangbeinS. (1989). Building communities of readers and writers. The Reading Teacher, 42, 560–567.
9.
DanielsH. (1994). Literature circles: Voice and choice in the student-centered classroom.York, ME: Stenhouse.
10.
DennisonG. (1969). The lives of children: The story of the First Street school.New York: Random House.
11.
DeshonJ. P. (1997). Innocent and not-so-innocent contributions to inequality: Choice, power, and insensitivity in a first-grade writing workshop. Language Arts, 74, 12–16.
12.
DeyI. (1993). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists.New York: Routledge.
13.
Diaz-GemmatiG. (1995). … And justice for all. (Occasional Paper No. 41). Berkeley: University of California, National Center for the Study of Writing.
14.
Dixon-KraussL. (Ed.). (1996). Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment. White Plains, NY: Longman.
15.
DuganJ. (1997). Transactional literature discussions: Engaging students in the appreciation and understanding of literature. The Reading Teacher, 51, 86–96.
16.
EncisoP. E. (1997). Negotiating the meaning of difference: Talking back to multicultural literature. In RogersT.SoterA. O. (Eds.), Reading across cultures: Teaching literature in a diverse society (pp. 13–41). New York: Teachers College Press.
17.
EvansK. S. (1996a). A closer look at literature discussion groups: The influence of gender on student response and discourse. The New Advocate, 9, 183–196.
18.
EvansK. S. (1996b). Creating spaces for equity? The role of positioning in peer-led literature discussions. Language Arts, 73, 194–202.
19.
FindersM. J. (1997). Just girls: Hidden literacies and life in junior high.New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
FreireP. (1970/1987). Pedagogy of the oppressed.New York: Continuum.
21.
GlaserB. G.StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
22.
GoatleyV. (1997). Talk about text among special education students. In McMahonS. I.RaphaelT. E.GoatleyV. J.PardoL. S. (Eds.), The Book Club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk (pp. 119–137). New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
GubaE. G. (1978). Toward a methodology of naturalistic inquiry in educational evaluation. (CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation No. 9). Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles, Center for the Study of Evaluation.
24.
HadeD. D. (1997). Reading multiculturally. In HarrisV. J. (Ed.), Using multiethnic literature in the K-8 classroom (pp. 233–256). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon.
25.
HarryB. (1992). Cultural diversity, families, and the special education system.New York: Teachers College Press.
26.
HesseK. (1991). Wish on a Unicorn.New York: Henry Holt.
27.
HiebertE. H.FisherC. W. (1991). Task and talk structure that foster literacy. In HiebertE. H. (Ed.), Literacy for a diverse society (pp. 141–156). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
JiménezR. T. (2002). Key research, policy, and practice issues for fostering the literacy development of Latino students. Focus on Exceptional Children, 34, 1–10.
29.
JohnsonS. (1999). Evolution. In AllenJ. (Ed.), Class actions: Literacy education for a democratic society (pp. 118–132). New York: Teachers College Press.
30.
JohnstonP. J. (1997). Knowing literacy: Constructive literacy assessment.York, ME: Stenhouse.
31.
KraglerS. (1996). Vygotsky and at-risk readers: Assessment and instructional implications. In Dixon-KraussL. (Ed.), Vygotsky in the classroom: Mediated literacy instruction and assessment (pp. 149–160). White Plains, NY: Longman.
32.
LeCompteM. D.PreissleJ. (1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
LeeH. (1960). To kill a mockingbird.Philadelphia: Lippincott.
34.
LensmireT. (1993). Following the child, socioanalysis, and threats to community: Teacher response to children's texts. Curriculum Inquiry, 23, 265–299.
35.
LesterJ. (1968). To be a slave.New York: Dial.
36.
LewisC. (1997). The social drama of literature discussion in a fifth/sixth-grade classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 163–204.
37.
MatthewsM. W.KesnerJ. E. (2000). The silencing of Sammy: One struggling reader learning with his peers. The Reading Teacher, 53, 382–390.
38.
McKissackP. C. (1997). Run away home.New York: Scholastic.
39.
McMahonS. I. (1997). Book clubs: Contexts for students to lead their own discussion. In McMahonS. I.RaphaelT. E.GoatleyV. J.PardoL. S. (Eds.), The Book Club connection: Literacy learning and classroom talk (pp. 89–106). New York: Teachers College Press.
40.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41.
MichaloveB. (1999). Examining prejudice in history and in ourselves. In AllenJ. (Ed.), Class actions: Literacy education for a democratic society (pp. 21–33). New York: Teachers College Press.
42.
MillardE. (1994). Stories of reading. In CorcoranB.HayhoeM.PradlG. (Eds.), Knowledge in the making: Challenging the text in the classroom (pp. 245–257). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
43.
MollL. C. (1990). Introduction. In MollL. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky in education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 1–27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44.
MollL. C.GreenbergJ. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In MollL. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky in education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 206–222). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45.
MöllerK. J. (2001). Reading socially in a multicultural world: Fourth graders' group discussions of literature with social justice themes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.
46.
MöllerK. J.AllenJ. (2000). Connecting, resisting and searching for safer places: Students respond to Mildred Taylor's The Friendship. Journal of Literacy Research, 32, 145–186.
47.
OakesJ. (1986). Tracking, inequality, and the rhetoric of reform: Why schools don't change. Journal of Education, 168, 60–80.
48.
OakesJ. (1992). Can tracking research inform practice? Technical, normative, and political considerations. Educational Researcher, 21, 12–21.
49.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
50.
PhelpsS.WeaverD. (1999). Public and personal voices in adolescents' classroom talk. Journal of Literacy Research, 31, 321–354.
51.
RawlsW. (1961). Where the red fern grows.New York: Bantam.
RiessmanC. K. (1993). Narrative analysis: Qualitative research methods.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
RosenblattL. (1995). Literature as exploration (5th ed.). New York: Modern Language Association.
55.
ShepardL. (1991). Negative policies for dealing with diversity: When does assessment and diagnosis turn into sorting and segregation? In HiebertE. (Ed.), Literature for a diverse society: Perspectives, practices, and policies (pp. 279–298). New York: Teachers College Press.
56.
ShortK. G. (1997). Literature as a way of knowing.New York: Stenhouse.
57.
ShortK. G.KauffmanG. (1995). “So what do I do?”: The role of the teacher in literature circles. In RoserN. L.MartinezM. G. (Eds.), Book talk and beyond: Children and teachers respond to literature (pp. 140–149). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
58.
ShortK. G.KauffmanG.KaserS.KahnL. H.CrawfordK. M. (1999). “Teacher-watching”: Examining teacher talk in literature circles. Language Arts, 76, 377–385.
59.
SmithF. (1988). Joining the literacy club.Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
60.
SolskenJ.WillettJ.Wilson-KeenanJ. (2000). Cultivating hybrid texts in multicultural classrooms: Promise and challenge. Research in the Teaching of English, 35, 179–212.
StreetB. V. (1993). The new literacy studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 16, 81–97.
63.
TaylorM. D. (1976). Roll of thunder, hear my cry.New York: Dial.
64.
TudgeJ. (1990). Vygotsky, the zone of proximal development, and peer collaboration: Implications for classroom practice. In MollL. C. (Ed.), Vygotsky in education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 155–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
VygotskyL. (1934/1986). Thought and language (KozulinA., Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
66.
VygotskyL. (1978). Mind in society.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
67.
Walker-DalhouseD. (1992). Using African American literature to increase ethnic understanding. The Reading Teacher, 45, 416–422.
68.
WalmsleyS.AllingtonR. (1995). Redefining and reforming instructional support programs for at-risk students. In AllingtonR.WalmsleyS. (Eds.), No quick fix: Rethinking literacy programs in America's elementary schools (pp. 19–44). New York: Teachers College Press.
