We report on the development and validation of the TEX-IN3, a research tool and protocol designed to assess the quality of the classroom literacy environment. The TEX-IN3 is described in terms of its theoretical base as well as its practical applications. The TEX-IN3 includes three basic components: a text inventory, a text “in-use” observation, and a series of text interviews. The validation of the TEX-IN3 is first reported in terms of its content, development, and focus. Next, a validation study examining the relationship between the TEX-IN3 and student growth in reading comprehension is described. The findings from this study offer support for all three components of the instrument as associated with student achievement growth.
References
1.
American Guidance Services. (2001). Group Reading Assessment and Diagnostic Evaluation (GRADE).Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.
2.
BartonD. (1994). Literacy: An introduction to the ecology of written language.Oxford, England: Blackwell.
3.
BartonD. (2000). Literacy practices. In BartonD.HamiltonM.IvanicR. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 7–15). London: Routledge.
4.
BartonD.HamiltonM. (2000). Literacy practices. In BartonD.HamiltonM.IvanicR. (Eds.), Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context (pp. 167–179). London: Routledge.
5.
BartonD.HamiltonM.IvanicR. (Eds.). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context.London: Routledge.
6.
CambourneB. (2000). Observing literacy learning in elementary classrooms: Twenty-nine years of classroom anthropology. The Reading Teacher, 53, 512–515.
7.
DowhowerS. I.BeagleK. G. (1998). The print environment in kindergartens: A study of conventional and holistic teachers and their classrooms in three settings. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 163–190.
8.
DoyleW. (1983). Academic work. Review of Educational Research, 53, 159–199.
9.
DukeN. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35, 202–224.
10.
DukeN. K.MartineauJ. A.FrankK. A.Bennett-ArmisteadV. S. (2003). 33.6 minutes per day: The impact of including more informational text in first grade. Unpublished manuscript, Michigan State University.
FractorJ. S.WoodruffM.MartinezM.TealeW. H. (1993). Let's not miss opportunities to promote voluntary reading: Classroom libraries in the elementary school. The Reading Teacher, 46, 476–484.
13.
HoffmanJ. V.SailorsM. (2002). Text Inventory, Texts In-Use and Text Interviews Observation System. Unpublished manuscript, University of Texas at Austin.
14.
International Reading Association (2003). Prepared to make a difference: An executive summary of the National Commission on Excellence in Elementary Teacher Preparation for Reading Instruction.Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
15.
LangerJ. A. (1987). Language, literacy, and culture: Issues in society and school.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
LoughlinC. E.IvenerB. L. (1987). Literacy behaviors of kindergarten-primary children in high stimulus-level literacy environments. Part I: The instrument. Part II: Environments and literacy behaviors. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 354077).
17.
MalochB.HoffmanJ. V. (2004). Local texts: Reading and writing “of the classroom.” In HoffmanJ.SchallertD. (Eds.), The texts in elementary classrooms (pp.145–156). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
18.
McGill-FranzenA.AllingtonR. L.YokoiL.BrooksG. (1999). Putting books in the classroom seems necessary but not sufficient. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 67–74.
MorrowL. M. (1982). Relationships between literacy programs, library corner design, and children's use of literature. Journal of Educational Research, 75, 339–344.
21.
MorrowL. M.WeinsteinC. S. (1982). Increasing children's use of literature through program and physical design changes. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 133–137.
22.
MorrowL. M.TraceyD. H.WooD. G.PressleyM. (1999). Characteristics of exemplary first-grade literacy instruction. The Reading Teacher, 52, 462–476.
23.
NeumanS. B. (1999). Books make a difference: A study of access to literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 286–311.
24.
PressleyM. (2002). What I have learned up until now about research methods in reading education. In SchallertD. L.FairbanksC. M.WorthyJ.MalochB.HoffmanJ. V. (Eds.), 51st Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 33–44). Oak Creek, WI: National Reading Conference.
25.
PressleyM. J.RankinT.YokoiL. (1996). A survey of instructional practices of primary teachers nominated as effective in promoting literacy. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 363–384.
26.
SailorsM. (2001). TEX-IN3: Text Inventory, Texts In-Use, and Text Interview Training Module.Bastrop, TX: JEASER Publishing.
27.
SearfossL. W.ReadenceJ. E. (1983). Guiding readers to meaning. Reading Psychology, 4, 29–36.
28.
SmithM. W.DickinsonD. K.SangeorgeA.AnastasopoulosL. (2002). Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation (ELLCO) toolkit.Baltimore: Brookes Publishing.
29.
StallingsJ. (1975). Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in Follow Through classrooms. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 40, 7–8.
30.
SnowC. E.BarnesW. S.ChandlerJ.GoodmanI. F.HemphillL. (1991). Unfulfilled expectations: Home and school influences on literacy.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
TaylorB. M.PearsonP. D.ClarkK. F.WalpoleS. (1999). Beating the odds in teaching all children to read (Report #2-006). Ann Arbor, MI: Center for Improvement in Early Reading Achievement.
32.
TaylorN. E.BlumI.LogsdonD. M. (1986). The development of written language awareness: Environmental aspects and program characteristics. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 132–149.
33.
Wharton-McDonaldR.PressleyM.HampstonJ. M. (1998). Literacy instruction in nine first-grade classrooms: Teacher characteristics and student achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 99, 101–128.
34.
WolfersbergerM. A.SudweeksR. R. (1998, April). The development of the Classroom Literacy Environment Profile and an investigation of the generalizability of CLEP ratings. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Montreal, Canada.
