The article examines the claim of Anderson et al. (2001) that students engaged in small-group discussions will tend to imitate and appropriate argument stratagems and other discourse behaviors from one another when it is appropriate to do so. In a study involving 67 5th- and 6th-grade students engaged in numerous small-group discussions, some evidence of appropriation was obtained, especially in regards to asking other students for reasons (“support requests”). There were several cases, however, in which students did not appear to use these requests appropriately. These cases are analyzed from the standpoint of both speech act theory and argumentation frames. The analyses indicate that students experienced a conflict between frames associated with traditional, ritualized participant structures and open, collaborative discussions. The danger of teachers and students mixing discourse frames in alternative learning environments is discussed.
References
1.
AgarM. (1994). Language shock: Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: Morrow.
2.
AlexanderP. A.GrahamS.HarrisK. R. (1998). A perspective on strategy research: Progress and prospects. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 129–154.
3.
AlmasiJ. F. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314–351.
4.
AlmasiJ. F.O'FlahavanJ. F.AryaP. (2001). A comparative analysis of student and teacher development in more and less proficient discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 96–120.
5.
AndersonR. C.ChinnC.ChangJ.WaggonerM.YiH. (1997). On the logical integrity of children's arguments. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 135–167.
6.
AndersonR. C.ChinnC.WaggonerM.NyguyenK. (1998). Intellectually stimulating story discussions. In OsbornJ.LehrF. (Eds.), Literacy for all: Issues in teaching and learning (pp. 172–186). New York: Guilford.
7.
AndersonR. C.Nguyen-JahielK.McNurlenB.ArchodidouA.KimS.ReznitskayaA.TillmansM.GilbertL. (2001). The snowball phenomenon: Spread of ways of talking and ways of thinking across groups of children. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 1–46.
8.
ApplebeeR. N. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9.
AustinJ. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
AzmitiaM. (1998). Peer interactive minds: Developmental, theoretical, and methodological issues. In FaulknerD.LittletonK.WoodheadM. (Eds.), Learning relationships in the classroom (pp. 207–234). New York: Open University Press.
11.
BakhtinM. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (McGeeV. W., Trans.). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
12.
BanduraA. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13.
BanduraA.WaltersR. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt.
14.
BatesonG. (1972). A theory of play and fantasy. Reprinted in Steps to an ecology of mind (pp. 117–193). New York: Ballentine.
15.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.HamiltonR. L.KucanL. (1997). Questioning the author: An approach for enhancing student engagement with text. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
16.
BensleyD. A.HaynesC. (1995). The acquisition of general purpose strategic knowledge for argumentation. Teaching of Psychology, 22, 41–45.
17.
BergerJ.CohenB. P.ZelditchM. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255.
18.
BlickleG. (1997). Argumentativeness and the facets of the big five. Psychological Reports, 81, 1379–1385.
19.
BransfordJ. D.BrownA. L.CockingR. R. (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
20.
BrownA. L. (1997). Transforming schools into communities of thinking and learning about serious matters. American Psychologist, 52, 399–413.
21.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1990). Communities of learning and thinking, or a context by any other name. Contributions to Human Development, 21, 108–126.
22.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1994). Guided discovery in a community of learners. In McGillyK. (Ed.), Classroom lessons: Integrating cognitive theory and classroom practice (pp. 229–272). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
23.
BrownA. L.CampioneJ. C. (1996). Psychological theory and the design of innovative learning environments: On procedures, principles, and systems. In GlaserR. (Ed.), Innovations in learning: New environments for education (pp. 289–328). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
24.
BruningR. H.SchrawG. J.RonningR. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
25.
CaricoK. M. (2001). Negotiating meaning in classroom literature discussions. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 44, 510–518.
26.
CarrollJ. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27.
CarverR. P. (1990). Intelligence and reading ability in grades 2–12. Intelligence, 14, 449–455.
28.
ChinnC. A.O'DonnellA. M.JinksT. S. (2000). The structure of discourse in collaborative learning. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 77–97.
29.
ClarkH. H.SchaeferE. F. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259–294.
30.
CohenE. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64, 1–35.
31.
CohenE. G.LotanR. A. (1994, April). Complex instruction and status problems in the un-tracked middle school. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
32.
CoorenF. (2000). The organizing property of communication. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
33.
CoulterJ. (1990). Elementary properties of argument sequences. In PsathasG., Interaction competence (pp. 181–204). New York: Irvington.
34.
CubanL. (1986). Teachers and machines: The classroom use of technology since 1920. New York: Teachers College Press.
35.
CubanL. (1998). High-tech schools and low-tech teaching. A commentary. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 14 (2), 6–7.
36.
DersleyI.WoottonA. (2000). Complaint sequences within antagonistic argument. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 33, 375–406.
37.
DewdneyP.MichellG. (1997). Asking “why” questions in the reference interview: A theoretical justification. Library Quarterly, 67, 50–71.
38.
DeyI. (1996). Qualitative data analysis: A user-friendly guide for social scientists. New York: Routledge.
39.
DillonJ. T. (1994). Using discussion in classrooms. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
40.
DryzekJ. S. (1993). Policy analysis and planning: From science to argument. Reframing policy discourse. In FischerF.ForesterJ. (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 213–232). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
41.
DuffyG. G.RoehlerL. R.HermannB. A. (1988). Modeling mental processes helps poor readers become strategic readers. The Reading Teacher, 41, 762–767.
42.
DuschlR. A.EllenbogenK. M.ErduranS. (1999, August). Middle school students' dialogic argumentation. Paper presented at the European Science Education Research Association Conference, Kiel, Germany.
43.
EvansK. S. (1996). Creating spaces of equity? The role of positioning in peer-led literature discussions. Language Arts, 73, 194–201.
44.
EvansK. S.AlvermannD.AndersP. L. (1998). Literature discussion groups: An examination of gender roles. Reading Research and Instruction, 37, 107–122.
45.
EysenckS. B. G. (1963). Manual for the Junior Eysenck Personality Inventory. San Diego, CA: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
46.
FernadezM.WegerifR.MercerN.Rojas-DrummondS. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone of proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interactions, 36, 40–62.
47.
FlavellJ. H.MillerP. H.MillerS. A. (1993). Cognitive development (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
48.
GallM. D.GallJ. P. (1993, April). Teacher and student roles in different types of classroom discussions. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 359256).
49.
GallM. D.GillettM. (1980). The discussion method in classroom teaching. Theory Into Practice, 19, 98–103.
50.
GarveyC.ShantzC. (1992). Conflict talk: Approaches toward adversative discourse. In ShantzC. U.HartupW. W. (Eds.), Conflict in child development (pp. 93–121). New York: Cambridge University Press.
51.
GayL. R.AirasianP. (2000). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
52.
GeisM. L. (1995). Speech acts and conversational interaction. New York: Cambridge University Press.
53.
GirottoV.LightP. (1993). The pragmatic bases of children's reasoning. In LightP.ButterworthG., Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 134–156). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
54.
GitomerD. H. (1984). A cognitive analysis of a complex troubleshooting task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh.
55.
GoatleyV. J.BrockC. H.RaphaelT. E. (1995). Diverse learners participating in regular education “Book Clubs.”Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 352–380.
56.
GoffmanE. (1986). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
57.
GoodwinM. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
58.
GreenoJ. G.CollinsA. M.ResnickL. B. (1996). Cognition and Learning. In BerlinerD. C.CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–46). New York: Macmillan.
59.
GreenoJ. G.HallR. P. (1997). Practicing representation: Learning with and about representational form. Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 361–367.
60.
GriceH. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In ColeP.MorganJ. (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press.
61.
GruberH. (1998). Disagreeing: Sequential placement and internal structure of disagreements in conflict episodes. Text, 18, 467–503.
62.
HanssenE. (1990). Planning for literature circles: Variation in focus and structure. In ShortK. G.PierceK. M. (Eds.), Talking about books: Creating literature communities (pp. 199–209). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
63.
HarréR.Van LangehoveL. (1991). Varieties of positioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 21, 393–407.
64.
HeathS. B. (1978). Teacher talk: Language in the classroom. Language in Education: Theory and Practice, 1, 1–30.
65.
HinchmanK. A.YoungJ. P. (2001). Speaking but not being heard: Two adolescents negotiate classroom talk about text. Journal of Literacy Research, 33, 243–268.
66.
HoganK.NastasiB. K.PressleyM. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379–432.
67.
HoyleS. M. (1993). Participation frameworks in sportscasting play: Imaginary and literal footings. In TannenD. (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 114–145). New York: Oxford University Press.
HymesD. H. (1974). Foundations in sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
70.
JacksonS.JacobsS. (1992). Structure of conversational argument: Pragmatic bases for the enthymeme. In BenoitW. L.HampleD.BenoitP. J. (Eds.), Readings in argumentation (pp. 681–706). New York: Foris.
71.
JungC. G. (1971). Psychological types (BaynesH. G., Trans., as revised by R. F. C. Hull). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1921).
72.
KeeferM. W.ZeitzC. M.ResnickL. B. (2000). Judging the quality of peer-led student dialogues. Cognition and Instruction, 18, 53–81.
73.
KingA.StaffieriA.AdelgaisA. (1998). Mutual peer tutoring: Effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold peer learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 134–152.
74.
KoschmannT. (1999). Toward a dialogic theory of learning: Bakhtin's contribution to understanding learning in settings of collaboration. In HoadlyC.RoschelleJ. (Eds.), Computer support for collaborative learning (CSCL) 1999. Designing new media for a new millennium: Learning, education, and training (pp. 308–313). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
75.
LeinhardtG. (1993). Weaving instructional explanations in history. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 46–74.
76.
LemkeJ. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
77.
Leont'evA. N. (1981). Problems of the development of mind. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
78.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
79.
MaitlandC. F.BauerJ. M. (2001). National level, culture, and global diffusion: The case of the Internet. In EssC.SudweeksF. (Ed.), Culture, technology, and communication (pp. 87–128). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
80.
MatthewsM. W.KesnerJ. E. (2000). The silencing of Sammy: One struggling reader learning with his peers. The Reading Teacher, 53, 382–390.
81.
MelothM. S.DeeringP. D. (1999). The role of the teacher in promoting cognitive processing during collaborative learning. In O'DonnellA. M.KingA. (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on peer learning (pp. 235–255). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
82.
MintropH. (2001). Educating students to teach in a constructivist way — Can it all be done?. Teachers College Record, 103, 207–239.
83.
MojeE. B.CollazoT.CarrilloR.MarxR. W. (2001). “Maestro, what is ‘quality’?”: Language, literacy, and discourse in project-based science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 469–498.
84.
MuellerA.FlemingT. (2001). Cooperative learning: Listening to how children work at school. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 259–265.
85.
NelsonD. (1984). Transformations: Process and theory. Santa Monica, CA: Center for City Building Educational Programs.
86.
NewmanD.GriffinP.ColeM. (1989). The construction zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.
87.
NussbaumE. M. (1997). The evolution of argumentation in an alternative learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
88.
NussbaumE. M. (2002a). How introverts versus extraverts approach small-group argumentative discussions. The Elementary School Journal, 102, 183–197.
89.
NussbaumE. M. (2002b). The process of becoming a participant in small-group critical discussions: A case study. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 45, 488–497.
90.
NystrandM.GamoranA. (1997). The big picture: Language and learning in hundreds of English lessons. In NystrandM. (Ed.), Opening dialogue: Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom (pp. 30–74). New York: Teachers College Press.
91.
NystrandM.GraffN. (2001). Report in argument's clothing: An ecological perspective on writing instruction in a seventh-grade classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 479–493.
92.
OrsoliniM. (1993). “Dwarfs do not shoot”: An analysis of children's justifications. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 281–297.
93.
PalincsarA. S. (1988, April). Collaborating in the interest of collaborative learning. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 305169).
94.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
95.
PalincsarA. S.BrownA. L. (1989). Classroom dialogues to promote self-regulated comprehension. In BrophyJ. (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching (Vol. 1). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
96.
PhillipsD. C.BurbulesN. C. (2000). Postpositivism and educational research. New York: Roman and Littlefield.
97.
PiolatA.RousseyJ.-Y.GombertA. (1999). The development of argumentative schema in writing. In RijlaarsdamG.EspéretE.AndriessenJ.CoiriersP. (Vol. Eds.), Foundations of argumentative text processing (pp. 117–135). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
98.
PontecorvoC.GirardetH. (1993). Arguing and reasoning in understanding historical topics. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 365–395.
99.
QinZ.JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T. (1995). Cooperative versus competitive efforts and problem solving. Review of Educational Research, 65, 129–143.
100.
RaphaelT.McMahonS.GoatleyV.BentleyJ.BoydF.PardoL.WoodmanD. (1994). Literature and discussion in the reading program. Language Arts, 69, 54–61.
101.
ReinM.SchonD. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In FischerF.ForesterJ. (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 145–166). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
102.
ResnickL.SalmonM.ZeitzC. N.WathenS. H. (1993). Reasoning in conversation. Special issue in discourse and shared reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 11, 347–364.
103.
ReznitskayaA.AndersonR. C.McNurlenB.Nguyen-JahielK.ArchodidouA.KimS. (2001). Influences of oral discussion on written argument. Discourse Processes, 32, 155–175.
104.
RipsL. J.BremS. K.BailensonJ. N. (1999). Reasoning dialogues. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8, 172–177.
105.
RobyT. W. (1988). Models of discussion. In DillonJ. T. (Ed.), Questioning and discussion: A multidisciplinary study (pp. 163–191). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
106.
RogersE. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
107.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprentices in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
108.
RoseberryA. S.WarrenB.ConantF. R. (1992). Appropriating scientific discourse: Findings from language minority classrooms. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 61–94.
109.
RosenshineB.MeisterC. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479–530.
110.
RothW.-M. (1996). Knowledge diffusion in a grade 4–5 classroom during a unit on civil engineering: An analysis of a classroom community in terms of its changing resources and practices. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 179–220.
111.
SchiffrinD. (1993). “Speaking for another” in sociolinguistic interviews: Alignment, identities, and frames. In TannenD. (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 231–263). New York: Oxford University Press.
112.
SchiffrinD. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Cambridge, MA: B. Blackwell.
113.
SchoenfeldA. H. (1987). What's all the fuss about metacognition? In SchoenfeldA. H. (Ed.), Cognitive science and mathematics education (pp. 189–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
114.
SchunkD. H.ZimmermanB. J. (1997). Social origins of self-regulatory competence. Educational Psychologist, 32, 195–208.
115.
SchwarzB. B.NeumanY.BiezunerS. (2000). Two wrongs may make a right: If they argue together!Cognition & Instruction, 18, 461–494.
116.
SearleJ. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. New York: Cambridge University Press.
117.
SearleJ. R. (1992). Conversation. In SearleJ. R., (On) Searle on conversation (pp. 7–30). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
118.
SearleJ. R.VandervekenD. (1985). Foundations of illocutionary logic. New York: Cambridge University Press.
TannenD. (1993). What's in a frame? Surface evidence for underlying expectation. In TannenD. (Ed.), Framing in discourse (pp. 14–56). New York: Oxford University Press.
122.
ToulminS. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
123.
ToulminS.RiekeR.JanikA. (1979). An introduction to reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
124.
van EemerenF. H.GrootendorstR. (1989). Speech act conditions as tools for reconstructing argumentative discourse. Argumentation, 3, 367–383.
125.
VehviläinenS. (2001). Evaluative advice in educational counseling: The use of disagreement in the “stepwise entry” to advice. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 34, 371–398.
126.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (ColeM.John-SteinerV.ScribnerS.SoubermanE., Trans., Eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
127.
WaltonD. N. (1995). A pragmatic theory of fallacy. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
128.
WaltonD. N. (1996). Argument schemes for presumptive reasoning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
129.
WaltonD. N. (1998). The new dialectic: Conversational contexts of argument. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.
130.
WaltonD.KrabbeE. (1995). Commitment in dialogue: Basic concepts of interpersonal reasoning. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
131.
WebbN. M. (1995). Constructive activity and learning in collaborative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 406–423.
132.
WebbN. M.PalincsarA. S. (1996). Group processes in the classroom. In BerlinerD. C.CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 841–873). New York: Macmillan.
133.
WiencekJ.O'FlahavanJ. E. (1994). From teacher-led to peer discussions about literature: Suggestions for making the shift. Language Arts, 71, 488–497.
134.
WittgensteinL. (1958). Philosophical investigations (2nd ed., AnscombeG. E. M., Trans.). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
135.
Wynn-DancyM. L.GillamR. B. (1997). Accessing long-term memory: Metacognitive strategies and strategic action in adolescents. Topics in Language Disorders, 18, 32–44.
