Beginning readers' rime reading accuracy was assessed over three years to examine the influence of word frequency and rime-neighborhood size (the number of single syllable words with the same rime) on words presented in lists and stories. Twenty-seven 1st- and 2nd- grade students read 54 words and 27 nonwords containing rimes from different size neighborhoods. In Year 1, children showed effects of neighborhood size in high frequency words read in stories and in low frequency words read in lists and stories. In Year 2, rimes from large neighborhoods were read more accurately than rimes from medium and small neighborhoods in high- and low-frequency words. In Year 3, no effects of rime-neighborhood size were found for high-frequency words, but effects on low-frequency words continued. These results support Leslie and Calhoon's (1995) developmental model of the effects of rime-neighborhood size and word frequency as a function of higher levels of word learning.
References
1.
AdamsM. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
AdamsM. J.HugginsA.W. F. (1985). The growth of children's sight vocabulary: A quick test with educational and theoretical implications. Reading Research Quarterly, 20, 262–281.
3.
BerningerV. W.YatesC.LesterK. (1991). Multiple orthographic codes in reading and writing acquisition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 3, 115–149.
4.
BoweyJ. A.HansenJ. (1994). The development of orthographic rimes as units of word recognition. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 58, 465–488.
5.
CalhoonJ. A. (1991). Elementary words categorized by sound units. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
CarrollJ. B.DaviesP.RichmanB. (1971). The American heritage word frequency book.Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
7.
CunninghamP. M. (1979). Investigating a synthesized theory of mediated word identification. Reading Research Quarterly, 11, 127–143.
8.
EhriL. C. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In BarrR.KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D. (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, 2 (pp. 383–417). White Plains, NY: Longman Publishing.
9.
EhriL. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In GoughP.EhriL. C.JuelC. (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
EhriL. C. (1995). Phases of development in learning to read words by sight. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 116–125.
11.
EhriL. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In MetsalaJ.L.EhriL. C. (Eds). Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
12.
EhriL. C.RobbinsC. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12–26.
13.
GaskinsI.DownerM. A.AndersonR. C.CunninghamP. M.GaskinsR. W., Schommer, M. The Teachers at Benchmark School (1988). A meta-cognitive approach to phonics: Using what you know to decode what you don't know. Remedial & Special Education, 9, 36–41.
14.
GoswamiU. (1990). Phonological priming and orthographic analogies in reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 49, 323–340.
15.
GoswamiU. (1993). Toward an interactive analogy model of reading development: Decoding vowel graphemes in beginning reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56, 443–475.
16.
GoswamiU. (1998). The role of analogies in the development of word recognition. In MetsalaJ. L.EhriL. C. (Eds.) Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 41–63). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
17.
GoswamiU. (2000). Phonological and lexical processes. In KamilM. L.MosenthalP. B.PearsonP. D.BarrR. (Eds.). Handbook of Reading Research: Volume III (pp. 251–268). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
18.
GoswamiU.MeadF. (1993). Onset and rime awareness and analogies in reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 153–162.
19.
GunningR. (1968). The Fog index after twenty years. Journal of Business Communications, 6, 3–13.
20.
HardyN. D.JermanM. E. (1985). Readability estimator.Seattle, WA: Berta-Max, Inc.
21.
LaxonV. J.ColtheartV.KeatingC. (1988). Children find friendly words friendly too: Words with many orthographic neighbors are easier to read and spell. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 103–119.
22.
LaxonV. J.MastersonJ.MoranR. (1994). Are children's representations of words distributed? Effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency and regularity of naming. Language and Cognitive Processing, 9, 1–27.
23.
LeslieL.CalhoonJ. A. (1995). Factors affecting children's reading of rimes: Reading ability, word frequency, and rime-neighborhood size. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 576–586.
24.
LeslieL.CaldwellJ. (1990). The qualitative reading inventory.New York: Harper Collins.
25.
LeslieL.ThimkeB. (1986). The use of orthographic knowledge in beginning reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18, 229–241.
26.
MorrisD. (1993). The relationship between children's concept of word in text and phoneme awareness in learning to read: A longitudinal study. Research in the Teaching of English, 27, 133–154.
27.
PerfettiC. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In GoughP.EhriL.JuelC. (Eds.), Reading acquisition.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
28.
PetersonM. E.HainesL. P. (1992). Orthographic analogy training with kindergarten children: Effects on analogy use, phonemic segmentation, and letter-sound knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 109–127.
29.
SeidenbergM. S.McClellandJ. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word-recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523–568.
30.
StanovichK. E. (1992). Reading, spelling, and the orthographic cipher. In GoughP.EhriL.TreimanR. (Eds.), Reading Acquisition (pp. 307–342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31.
TreimanR.GoswamiU.BruckM. (1990). Not all nonwords are alike: Implications for reading development and theory. Memory and Cognition, 18, 559–567.
32.
WaltonP. D. (1995). Rhyming ability, phoneme identity, letter-sound knowledge, and the use of orthographic analogy by prereaders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 587–597.
33.
Webster's Elementary Dictionary (1986). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster, Inc.
34.
WheelerL. R.SmithE. H. (1954). A practical readability formula for the classroom teacher in the elementary grades. Elementary English, 31, 397–399.
35.
WordPerfect Corporation (1990). Word-Perfect: Spell Checker version 5.1.Orem, UT: Author.
36.
ZinnaD. R.LibermanI. Y.ShankweilerD. (1986). Children's sensitivity to factors influencing vowel reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 465–479.
37.
ZivianM. T.SamuelsM. T. (1986). Performance on a word-likeness task by normal readers and reading-disabled children. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 150–160.
