Benefits of Prelecture Quizzes

Abstract

We investigated the use of quizzes administered prior to lecture (i.e., prelecture quizzes) and compared them to no-quiz control groups. In previous research, the success of administering quizzes after covering a topic (i.e., postlecture quizzes) was contingent on the quizzes and the subsequent exams being of similar level and content. However, our study revealed that such contingencies were not true of prelecture quizzes. Students who received either matching or fill-in-the-blank prelecture quizzes, as compared to no quiz, performed better on both multiple-choice and essay exam questions. They also rated the lectures as a better preparation for exams and as more clear and organized. Finally, the quizzed students asked more high-level questions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. R.

(1981). Effects of prior knowledge on memory for new information. Memory & Cognition, 9, 237–246.

Ausubel

D. P.

Youssef

(1965). The effect of spaced repetition on meaningful retention. Journal of General Psychology, 73, 147–150.

Bjork

R. A.

(1979). Information-processing analysis of college teaching. Educational Psychologist, 14, 15–23.

Bloom

B. S.

(Ed.). (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook vol. 1. Cognitive domain. New York: McKay.

Burns

D. J.

Vinchur

A. J.

(1992). Effects of evaluative quizzes on test performance. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 19, 148–154.

Geiger

O. G.

Bostow

D. E.

(1976). Contingency-managed college instruction: Effects of weekly quizzes on performance on examination. Psychological Reports, 39, 707–710.

Graham

R. B.

(1999). Unannounced quizzes raise test scores selectively for mid-range students. Teaching of Psychology, 26, 271–273.

McKenzie

G. R.

(1973). Quizzes: Tools or tyrants. Instructional Science, 2, 281–293.

Tuckman

B. W.

(1996). The relative effectiveness of incentive motivation and prescribed learning strategy in improving college students' course performance. Journal of Experimental Education, 64, 197–210.