We describe 3 computer-based neuroscience laboratories. In the first 2 labs, we used commercially available interactive software to enhance the study of functional and comparative neuroanatomy and neurophysiology. In the remaining lab, we used customized software and hardware in 2 psychophysiological experiments. With the use of the computer-based technology, we have successfully met our pedagogical objectives while minimizing operating costs and maintaining flexibility of the lab space. Student response to the lab experience was overwhelmingly positive.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BradleyM. T.BlackM. E. (1998). A control question test oriented towards students. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 691–700.
2.
BradleyM. T.CullenM. C. (1993). Polygraph lie detection on real events in a laboratory setting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 76, 1051–1058.
3.
BradshawG. L.SteinmanB.McCarleyN. (2002). Epsych: Interactive demonstrations and experiments in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 231–233.
4.
FarwellL. A.DonchinE. (1991). The truth will out: Interrogative polygraphy (“lie detection”) with event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology, 28, 531–547.
5.
FarwellL. A.SmithS. S. (2001). Using brain MERMER testing to detect knowledge despite efforts to conceal. Journal of Forensic Science, 46, 135–143.
6.
FuredyJ. J. (1996). The North American polygraph and psychophysiology: Disinterested, uninterested, and interested perspectives. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 21, 97–105.
7.
GriffinJ. D. (2003). Technology in the teaching of neuroscience: Enhanced student learning. Advances in Physiological Education, 27, 146–155.
8.
HugdahlK. (1995). Psychophysiology: The mind-body perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
LennartzR. C. (1999). Electrophysiology of the undergraduate neu-roscience student: A laboratory exercise in human electromyography. Advances in Physiology Education, 22, S42–S50.
10.
LykkenD. T. (1991). Why (some) Americans believe in the lie detector while others believe in the Guilty Knowledge Test. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, 26, 214–222.
11.
MooreJ. W.StuartA. E. (2000). Neurons in Action: Computer simulations with NeuroLab. [Computer software]. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
12.
SolomonP. R.CooperS.PomerleauD. (1988). Computer simulation of the neuronal action potential. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 46–47.
13.
TeylerT. J.VoneidaT. J. (1992). Use of computer-assisted courseware in teaching neuroscience: The Graphic Brain. American Journal of Physiology, 263, S37–S44.
14.
ThompsonR. R.GeorgeK. (2003). Testing the relationship between levels of endogenous testosterone and physiological responses to facial expressions in men: An experiment conducted by students in an undergraduate behavioral neuroscience class. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 1, A41–A47.
15.
WilliamsS. M. (2000). Fundamentals of human neural structure (Sylvius 2.0) [Computer software]. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
