Previous research has questioned the educational value of taking introductory courses in psychology. Study 1 confirmed the usual null to negative associations between taking introductory psychology and performance in a subsequent psychology course. Study 2 showed that, after controlling for IQ, there was actually a positive association between taking introductory psychology and performance on a psychology knowledge pretest, which, in turn, was positively associated with course performance. Partial correlation analyses suggested that the apparent disadvantages of introductory psychology are an artifact of self-selection. Specifically, although taking introductory psychology provides beneficial knowledge, the choice to take the course may indicate a maladaptive scholastic style—possibly antiscientific mindedness. We recommend advertising psychology courses more properly as science-oriented to avoid misleading potential students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderP. A.JudyJ. E. (1988). The interaction of domain-specific and strategic knowledge in academic performance. Review of Educational Research, 58, 375–404.
2.
BrodyN. (1997). Intelligence, schooling, and society. American Psychologist, 52, 1046–1050.
3.
CarstensC. B.BeckH. P. (1986). The relationship of high school psychology and natural science courses to performance in a college introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 116–118.
4.
DochyF. J. R. C. (1992). Assessment of prior knowledge as a determinant for future learning: The use of knowledge state tests and knowledge profiles. Utrecht, The Netherlands: Kingsley.
5.
FedericiL.SchuergerJ. (1976). High school psychology students versus non-high school psychology students in a college introductory class. Teaching of Psychology, 3, 172–174.
6.
FurnhamA.RawlesR. (1993). What do prospective psychology students know about the subject?Psychologia: An International Journal of Psychology in the Orient, 36, 241–249.
7.
GagnéF.PèreSt. F. (2001). When IQ is controlled, does motivation still predict achievement?Intelligence, 30, 71–100.
8.
GeisingerK.F. (2001). Review of the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C. (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1360–1363). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
9.
GlaserR. (1984). Education and thinking: The role of knowledge. American Psychologist, 39, 93–104.
10.
GriggsR. A.JacksonS. L. (1988). A reexamination of the relationship of high school psychology and natural science courses to performance in a college introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 142–144.
11.
GriggsR. A.JacksonS. L.MeyerM. E. (1989). High school and college psychology: Two different worlds. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 118–120.
12.
HedgesB. W.ThomasJ. H. (1980). The effect of high school psychology on pre-course knowledge, midterm grades, and final grades in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 221–223.
13.
KlineP.LaphamS. L. (1992). Personality and faculty in British universities. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 855–857.
14.
KornbrotD. E. (1987). Science and psychology degree performance. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 409–417.
15.
LavinD. E. (1965). The prediction of academic performance: A theoretical analysis and review of research. New York: Sage.
16.
McCabeM. P. (1991). Influence of creativity and intelligence on academic performance. Journal of Creative Behavior, 25, 116–122.
17.
McCannS. J. H.MeenK. S. (1984). Anxiety, ability, and academic achievement. Journal of Social Psychology, 124, 257–258.
18.
McKelvieS. J. (1989). The Wonderlic Personnel Test: Reliability and validity in an academic setting. Psychological Reports, 65, 161–162.
19.
PaulhusD. L.BruceM. N. (1990, June). The over-claiming questionnaire: Claiming more than we can know. Poster session presented at the meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
20.
PaulhusD. L.HarmsP. D. (in press). The over-claiming technique: Measuring cognitive ability independent of bias. Intelligence.
21.
SchrawG. (2001). Review of the Wonderlic Personnel Test and Scholastic Level Exam. In PlakeB. S.ImparaJ. C. (Eds.), The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 1363–1364). Lincoln, NE: The Buros Institute of Mental Measurements.
22.
SchutzP. A.DrogoszL. E.WhiteV. E.DiStefanoC. (1998). Prior knowledge, attitude, and strategy use in an introduction to statistics course. Learning and Individual Differences, 10, 291–308.
23.
SternbergR. J. (1988). The triarchic mind: A new theory of intelligence. New York: Viking.
24.
ThompsonR. A.ZamboangaB. L. (2003). Prior knowledge and its relevance to student achievement in introduction to psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 30, 96–101.
25.
WatersR. (1979). Another brick in the wall, Pt. 2. [Recorded by Pink Floyd]. On The Wall [record]. New York: Columbia.
26.
WonderlicE. D. (1983). Wonderlic Personnel Test manual. Northfield, IL: Wonderlic.
27.
ZanichM. L.GroverD. E. (1989). Introductory psychology from the standpoint of the consumer. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 72–74.
