Instructors teaching psychological assessment can use this demonstration to illustrate potential biases when subjectively interpreting responses to projective stimuli. Specifically, the demonstration illustrates how prior expectancies often lead the interpreter to focus on responses that “fit” with the initial impression (i.e., the tendency to collect confirmatory data). The demonstration utilizes active student participation, holds student interest, stimulates subsequent class discussion, and results in generally positive feedback from students.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BeutlerL. E. (1995). Issues in selecting an assessment battery. In BeutlerL. E.BerrenM. R. (Eds.), Integrative assessment of adult personality (pp. 65–93). New York: Guilford.
2.
CohenR. J.SwerdlikM. E.PhillipsS. M. (1996). Psychological testing and assessment: An introduction to tests and measurements (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
3.
DawesR. M. (1994). House of cards: Psychology and psychotherapy built on myth. New York: Free Press.
4.
ExnerJ. E. (1993). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system: Vol. 1. Basic foundations (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.
5.
MurrayH. A. (1943). Thematic Apperception Test manual. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
NewmarkC. S. (Ed.). (1996). Major psychological assessment instruments (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
7.
ShontzF. C.GreenP. (1992). Trends in research on the Rorschach: Review and recommendations. Applied and Preventative Psychology, 1, 149–156.
8.
WeinerI. B. (1996). Some observations on the validity of the Rorschach inkblot method. Psychological Assessment, 8, 206–213.
