This classroom demonstration uses a readily available videotape clip of a robbery to introduce the topic of eyewitness testimony. Students view the videotape clip and, after a delay, complete a multiple-choice memory test for the witnessed event. Students generally perform more poorly than they expect on the test, which leads to a discussion of the fallibility of memory for witnessed events.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AschermannE.MantwillM.KohnkenG. (1991). An independent replication of the effectiveness of the cognitive interview. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5, 489–495.
2.
BekerianD. A. (1993). In search of the typical eye witness. American Psychologist, 48, 574–576.
3.
BekerianD. A.DennettJ. L. (1993). The cognitive interview technique: Reviving the issues. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 7, 275–297.
4.
CutlerB. L.PenrodS. D.MartensT. K. (1987). The reliability of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233–258.
5.
DavisonJ.(Executive Producer)VerhoevenP.(Director). (1987). RoboCop [Videotape], (Available from Orion Home Video).
6.
DragonW. (1992, May). To be or not to be: Uses for a video-taped shooting in the classroom. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Meeting, Chicago.
7.
EgethH. E. (1993). What do we not know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist, 48, 577–580.
8.
GeiselmanR. E.FisherR. P.MacKinnonD. P.HollandH. L. (1985). Eyewitness memory enhancement in the police interview: Cognitive retrieval mnemonics versus hypnosis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 401–412.
9.
GeiselmanR. E.PadillaJ. (1988). Cognitive interviewing with child witnesses. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16, 236–242.
10.
LoftusE. F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
LoftusE. F. (1993). Psychologists in the eyewitness world. American Psychologist, 48, 550–552.
12.
LoftusE. F.HoffmanH. G. (1989). Misinformation and memory: The creation of new memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 100–104.
13.
LoftusE. F.MillerD. G.BurnsH. J. (1978). Semantic integration of verbal information into visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 19–31.
14.
LuusC. A. E.WellsG. L. (1994). The malleability of eyewitness confidence: Co-witness and perseverance effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 714–723.
15.
McCloskeyM.ZaragozaM. S. (1985). Misleading postevent information and memory for events: Arguments and evidence against memory impairment hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 114, 1–16.
16.
MemonA.BullR. (1991). The cognitive interview: Its origins, empirical support, evaluation, and practical implications. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 291–307.
17.
MoyeT.YarbroughN. (1992). Instructor's resource manual to accompany Wortman/Loftus Psychology (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
18.
RayW. S. (1947). An instructional film for use in the fidelity of report experiment. The Journal of Psychology, 24, 293–296.
19.
WellsG. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification?American Psychologist, 48, 553–571.
20.
YuilleJ. C. (1993). We must study forensic eyewitnesses to know about them. American Psychologist, 48, 572–573.
21.
ZaragozaM. S.McCloskeyM.JarnisM. (1987). Misleading postevent information and recall of the original event: Further evidence against the memory impairment hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 13, 36–44.
