Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

American Psychological Association-accredited clinical doctor of philosophy (PhD), clinical doctor of psychology (PsyD), counseling, and school psychology doctoral programs were surveyed to assess the importance placed on various admission criteria, including having a master's degree in clinical psychology. In addition, potential benefits of obtaining a master's degree before enrolling in a doctoral program were assessed. Results indicated that clinical PhD programs view a terminal master's degree significantly more negatively than do the other programs. Benefits for terminal master's degree holders included credit transfer and, for those pursuing a PsyD, a more positive view toward the PsyD degree by some academicians. Although all programs reported Graduate Record Examination combined scores, undergraduate grades, and letters of recommendation as clearly important criteria when making admissions decisions, differences were found across programs in the value placed on research experience, journal publication, and work and life experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (1991). Graduate study in psychology: 1991. Washington, DC: Author.

American Psychological Association. (1993). APA-accredited doctoral programs in professional psychology: 1993. American Psychologist, 48, 1260–1270.

Annis

L. V.

Tucker

G. H.

Baker

D. A.

(1978). What happens to PhD program applicants who have master's degrees? American Psychologist, 33, 703–705.

Cashin

J. R.

Landrum

R. E.

(1991). Undergraduate students' perceptions of graduate admissions criteria in psychology. Psychological Reports, 69, 1107–1110.

Eddy

Lloyd

P. J.

Lubin

(1987). Enhancing the application to doctoral professional programs: Suggestions from a national survey. Teaching of Psychology, 14, 160–163.

Hines

(1986). Admissions criteria for ranking master's-level applicants to clinical doctoral programs. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 64–67.

Howell

R. J.

Murdock

M. L.

(1972). The questionable value of a master's degree for a PhD-pursuing student. American Psychologist, 27, 647–651.

Mayne

T. J.

Norcross

J. C.

Sayette

M. A.

(1994). Admission requirements, acceptance rates, and financial assistance in clinical psychology programs: Diversity across the practice-research continuum. American Psychologist, 49, 806–811.

Mealiea

W. L.

(1973a). MA and/or nothing? Comment on Howell and Murdock's article. American Psychologist, 28, 357.

10.

Mealiea

W. L.

(1973b). The unquestionable value of a master's degree for a PhD-pursuing student. American Psychologist, 28, 938–939.

11.

O'Sullivan

J. J.

Quevillon

R. P.

(1992). 40 years later: Is the Boulder model still alive? American Psychologist, 47, 67–70.

12.

Purdy

J. E.

Reinehr

R. C.

Swam

J. D.

(1989). Graduate admissions criteria of leading psychology departments. American Psychologist, 44, 960–961.

13.

Roose

K. D.

Andersen

C. J.

(1970). A rating of graduate programs. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

14.

Saccuzzo

D. P.

Schulte

R. H.

(1978). The value of a terminal master's degree for PhD-pursuing students in psychology. American Psychologist, 33, 862–864

15.

Sleek

(1995, January). Managed care sharpens master's-degree debate. APA Monitor, pp. 8–9.

16.

Thelen

M. H.

Ewing

D. R.

(1970). Roles, functions, and training in clinical psychology: A survey of academic clinicians. American Psychologist, 25, 550–554.

17.

Thelen

M. H.

Rodriguez

M. D.

(1987). Attitudes of academic and applied clinical psychologists toward training issues: 1969–1984. American Psychologist, 42, 412–415.

18.

Ward

Ziegler

D. J.

(1973). On Howell and Murdock. American Psychologist, 28, 91.

Value of a Master's Degree for Gaining Admission to Doctoral Programs in Psychology

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References