Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We designed a senior seminar to address many theoretical and practical issues involved with, multidimensional assessment. We describe the structure of the course and various assessment measures used to tap student knowledge and student experiences. This course allowed us to accomplish several assessment and pedagogical goals. The course served as an integrative and self-reflective vehicle for students. As students became actively involved in identifying the body of knowledge that defines psychology, they also gained a better sense of the intricacies of assessment. Faculty gained information that can be directly applied to improving teaching and learning. We provide recommendations for using a seminar for assessment.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Association of Higher Education Assessment Forum. (1992). Principles of good practice for assessing student learning. Washington, DC: Author.

Angelo

T. A.

(1995). Reassessing assessment. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 47, 10–13.

Baker

E. L.

O'Neil

H. F.

Jr. Linn

R. L.

(1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance-based assessment. American Psychologist, 48, 1210–1218.

Bonwell

C. C.

Eison

J. A.

(1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1). Washington, DC: George Washington University.

Ewell

P. T.

(1991). To capture the ineffable: New forms of assessment in higher education. Review of Research in Education, 17, 75–125.

Halpern

D. F.

(1988). Assessing student outcomes for psychology majors. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 181–186.

Halpern

D. F.

Appleby

D. C.

Beers

S. E.

Cowan

C. L.

Furedy

J. J.

Halonen

J. S.

Horton

C. P.

Peden

B. F.

Pittenger

D. J.

(1993). Targeting outcomes: Covering your assessment concerns and needs. In McGovern

T. V.

, Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 23–46). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Instructional Development Services. (1980). Improving your test questions. Irvine: University of California-Irvine.

Johnson

(1996, March). The capstone course: A synergistic tool for pedagogical and assessment goals in higher education. Paper presented at the meeting on Program Assessment in Higher Education, Eau Claire, WI.

10.

Lincoln

Y. S.

Guba

E. G.

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

11.

Mathie

V. A.

Beins

Benjamin

L. T.

Jr. Ewing

M. M.

Hall

C. C. I.

Henderson

McAdam

D. W.

Smith

R. A.

(1993). Promoting active learning in psychology courses. In McGovern

T. V.

, Handbook for enhancing undergraduate education in psychology (pp. 183–214). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

12.

Maykut

P. S.

Morehouse

R. E.

(1994). Beginning qualitative research. Chicago: Palmer.

13.

McKeachie

W. J.

(1994). Teaching tips (9th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.

14.

Myers

D. G.

(1995). Psychology (4th ed.). New York: Worth.

15.

North Central Association of Colleges and Schools. (1994). Handbook of accreditation. Chicago: Author.

16.

Prus

Johnson

(1994). A critical review of student assessment options. Rock Hill, SC: Winthrop College, Office of Assessment.

17.

Raphael

Halpert

L. H.

(1994). Graduate record examination psychology. New York: Prentice Hall.

18.

Sheehan

E. P.

(1994). A muitimethod assessment of the psychology major. Teaching of Psychology, 21, 74–78.

19.

Wiggins

(1993, November). Assessment: Authenticity, context, and validity. Phi Delta Kappan, 200–214.

20.

Wright

B. D.

(1995, August). Assessment—Finding the metaphor. Paper presented at the faculty forum assessment: Bureaucratic nuisance or opportunity to enhance teaching and learning, University of Wisconsin, La Crosse, WI.

Using a Senior Seminar for Assessing the Major

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References