A Computerized Demonstration of the False Consensus Effect

Abstract

Students in an advanced undergraduate laboratory course on social cognition replicated an experiment on the false consensus effect (Krueger & Clement, 1994). Interacting with a computer program, students viewed 40 statements. For each statement, they indicated whether they personally endorsed it, estimated the proportion of the population that would endorse it, and rated its social desirability. Half the students received feedback on the actual consensus in the population after making each consensus estimate, and the remaining students did not. Students analyzed data using a spreadsheet program. They found the traditional false consensus effect as item endorsers gave higher consensus estimates than did nonendorsers. They also found reliable within-subjects correlations between item endorsements and estimation errors, demonstrating the truly false consensus effect. Students also learned that feedback about the actual consensus does not reduce bias.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.

Butcher

J. N.

Dahlstrom

W. G.

Graham

J. R.

Tellegen

Kaemmer

(1989). MMPI—2 manual for administration and scoring. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Campbell

J. D.

(1986). Similarity and uniqueness: The effects of attribute type, relevance, and individual differences in self-esteem and depression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 281–294.

Dawes

R. M.

(1989). Statistical criteria for a truly false consensus effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–17.

Gilovich

Jennings

D. L.

Jennings

(1983). Causal focus and estimates of consensus: An examination of the false-consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 550–559.

Hays

W. L.

(1988). Statistics (4th ed.). Orlando, FL: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Hoch

S. J.

(1987). Perceived consensus and predictive accuracy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 221–234.

Katz

Allport

(1931). Students' attitudes. Syracuse, NY: Craftsman.

Kite

M. E.

(1991). Observer biases in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 161–164.

10.

Krueger

Clement

R. W.

(1994). The truly false consensus effect: An ineradicable and egocentric bias in social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 596–610.

11.

Krueger

Zeiger

J. S.

(1993). Social categorization and the truly false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 670–680.

12.

McNemar

(1962). Psychological statistics (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

13.

Microsoft Excel 4.0 [Computer software]. (1992). Redmond, WA: Microsoft Corporation.

14.

Ross

Greene

House

(1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.

15.

Sherman

S. J.

Chassin

Pressen

C. C.

Agostinelli

(1984). The role of evaluation and similarity principles in the false consensus effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1244–1262.

16.

Suls

Wan

C. K.

(1987). In search of the false-uniqueness phenomenon: Fear and estimates of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 211–217.