We conducted an evaluation of a computer-aided personalized system of instruction (CAPSI) program in two undergraduate psychology courses. The computer presented students with short essay tests on the course material and arranged for students who had satisfactorily completed various assignments to help evaluate other students' mastery of those assignments. On a questionnaire given at the end of the courses, most students indicated that they were satisfied with the use of the computer in the courses. Students most commonly cited convenience as the reason for giving the courses a favorable rating. Also, students who did well in previous courses tended to do well in the CAPSI courses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnbarM. (1991). Comparing assessments of students' knowledge by computerized open-ended and multiple-choice tests. Academic Medicine, 66, 420–422.
2.
ArcherN. P. (1989), Improving idea generation during decision making in small group computer conferences. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 18, 111–123.
3.
BloomB. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1(2), 1–12.
4.
CoombsN. (1993). Global empowerment of impaired learners: Data networks will transcend both physical distance and physical disabilities. Educational Media International, 30, 23–25.
5.
CrosbieJ.GlennK. (1993). A computer-based personalized system of instruction course in applied behavior analysis. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 25, 366–370.
6.
CrowellC. R.QuintanarL. R.GrantK. L. (1981). PROCTOR: An on-line student evaluation and monitoring system for use with PSI format courses. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation. 13. 121–127.
7.
GuskeyT. R. (1985). Implementing mastery learning. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8.
HantulaD. A.BoydJ. H.CrowellC. R. (1989). Ten years of behavioral instruction with computers: Trials, tribulations, and reflections. In Proceedings of the Academic Microcomputer Conference (pp. 81–92). Indianapolis: Author.
9.
HiltzS. R. (1986). The “virtual classroom”: Using computer-mediated communication for university teaching. Journal of Communication, 36, 95–104.
10.
HiltzS. R. (1990). Evaluating the virtual classroom. In HarasimL. M. (Ed.), Online education: Perspectives on a new environment (pp. 133–169). New York; Praeger.
11.
HoldenM. CWedmanJ. F. (1993). Future issues of computer-mediated communication. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 41(4), 5–24.
12.
KellerF. S. (1968). “Good-bye, teacher.”Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 1, 79–89.
13.
KinsnerW.PearJ. J. (1988). Computer-aided personalized system of insttuction for the virtual classroom. Canadian Journal of Educational Communication, 17, 21–36.
14.
KulikC.-L. C.KulikJ. A. (1991). Effectiveness of computer-based insttuction: An updated analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 75–94.
15.
KulikC.-L. CKulikJ. A.Bangert-DrownsR. L. (1990). Effectiveness of mastery learning programs: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 60, 265–299.
16.
LipseyM. W.WilsonD. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181–1209.
MehrensW. A. (1992). Using performance assessment for accountability purposes. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 11(1), 3–9, 20.
19.
PearJ. J.KinsnerW. (1988). Computer-aided personalized system of instruction: An effective and economical method for short-and long-distance education. Machine-Mediated Learning, 2, 213–237.
20.
RaeA. (1993). Self-paced learning with video for undergraduates: A multimedia Keller Plan. British Journal of Educational Technology, 24, 43–51.
21.
SpencerK. (1991). Modes, media and methods: The search for educational effectiveness. British Journal of Educational Technology, 22, 11–21.
22.
WelschL. A. (1982). Using electronic mail as a teaching tool. Communications of the ACM, 25(2), 105–108.
