Participants (N = 271) attending poster sessions at the 1993 APA convention completed a questionnaire about poster presentations. Respondents evaluated posters on three dimensions: visual display and organization, demeanor of the presenter, and content. Although each of these (dimensions was considered important, visual display seems paramount. Ease of poster review—facilitated by large type, concise presentation of material, and use of supplemental graphs and charts—is preferred. Poster presenters who are appropriately attentive to individuals reviewing their material are also appreciated.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BairdB. N. (1991). In-class poster sessions. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 27–29.
2.
ChuteD. L.BankB. (1983). Undergraduate seminars: The poster session solution. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 99–100.
3.
HirschR.EdelsteinM. E. (1992). In the eye of the beholder: Pretesting the effectiveness of health education materials. Journal of American College Health, 40, 292–293.
4.
HortonA. M. (1986). Reinforcement of poster attendance. The Behavior Therapist, 9, 198–222.
5.
WoolseyJ.D.. (1989). Combating poster fatigue: How to use visual grammar and analysis to effect better visual communications. Trends in Neuroscience, 12, 325–332.
