Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

A simple extra-credit assignment explicitly rewarded marginal or failing students for improving their learning and study strategies. The instructor approached individual students who were at risk for failing the course following the midterm exam and gave them the option of earning extra-credit points for regularly documenting a variety of effective learning and study skills. In contrast to control groups of matched marginal students and of nonfailing students, those attempting the extra-credit assignment improved their test performance from midterm to final exam. They were more likely to earn at least a grade of C and less likely to drop out of the course than the matched control group. They also evaluated the experience quite positively.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

C. A.

Jennings

D. L.

(1980). When experiences of failure promote expectations of success: The impact of attributing failure to ineffective strategies. Journal of Personality, 48, 393–407.

Annis

L. F.

(1983). The processes and effects of peer tutoring. Human Learning, 2, 39–47.

Baker

Lombardi

B. R.

(1985). Students' lecture notes and their relation to test performance. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 28–32.

Bate

B. R.

(1976). Extra credit: A token reinforcement system for increasing interest, motivation, and outside reading. In Mass

J. B.

Kleiber

D. A.

(Eds.), Directory of teaching innovations in psychology (pp. 64–65). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

Bebeau

M. J.

Eubanks

J. L.

Sullivan

H. J.

(1977). Incentive preferences of introductory psychology students. Teaching of Psychology, 4, 141–143.

Boswell

D. A.

(1980). Evaluation of transparencies for psychology instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 171–173.

Bouton

Garth

(1983). Learning in groups. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Bufford

(1976). Evaluation of a reinforcement procedure for accelerated work rate in a self-paced course. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, 208.

Glick

D. M.

Semb

(1978), Effects of pacing contingencies in personalized instruction: A review of the evidence. Journal of Personalized Instruction, 3, 36–42.

10.

Guskey

T. R.

(1988). Improving student learning in college classrooms. Springfield, IL: Thomas.

11.

Junn

(1990). [Undergraduate psychology faculty attitudes and practices regarding extra credit assignments: Data from a state university campus]. Unpublished raw data.

12.

McKeachie

W. J.

(1986). Teaching tips 8th ed.). Lexington, MA: Heath.

13.

Norcross

J. C.

Dooley

H. S.

Stevenson

J. F.

(1993). Faculty use and justification of extra credit: No middle ground? Teaching of Psychology, 20, 240–242.

14.

Norcross

J. C

Horrocks

L. J.

Stevenson

J. F.

(1989). Of barfights and gadflies: Attitudes and practices concerning extra credit in college courses. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 199–203.

15.

Oley

(1992). Extra credit and peer tutoring: Impact on the quality of writing in introductory psychology in an open admissions college. Teaching of Psychology, 19, 78–81.

16.

Palkovitz

R. J.

Lore

R. K.

(1980). Note taking and note review: Why students fail questions based on lecture material. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 159–161.

17.

Robinson

F. P.

(1961). Effective study. New York: Harper & Row.

18.

Sugar

Livosky

(1988). Enriching child psychology courses with a preschool journal option. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 93–95.

19.

Thomas

E. L.

Robinson

H. A.

(1972). Improving reading in every class: A sourcebook for teachers. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Empowering the Marginal Student: A Skills-Based Extra-Credit Assignment

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References