Traditionally, researchers have analyzed mixed factorial designs by dichotomizing the continuous variable and performing a factorial analysis of variance. Several problems surround the use of this approach, prompting many statisticians to recommend using moderated multiple regression as an alternative. This article presents the case for moderated multiple regression and provides on overview of the procedure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BissonnetteV.IckesW.BernsteinI.KnowlesE. (1990a). Item variances and median splits: Some discouraging and disquieting findings. Journal of Personality, 58, 595–601.
3.
BissonnetteV.IckesW.BernsteinI.KnowlesE. (1990b). Personality moderating variables: A warning about statistical artifact and a comparison of analytic techniques. Journal of Personality, 58, 567–587.
4.
CohenJ. (1983). The cost of dichotomization, Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 249–253.
5.
CohenJ.CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
6.
HumphreysL. G.FleishmanA. (1974). Pseudo-orthogonal and other analysis of variance designs involving individual-difference variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 464–472.
7.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L. (1990). Dichotomization of continuous variables: The implications for meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 334–349.
8.
MaxwellS. E.DelaneyH. D. (1993). Bivariate median splits and spurious statistical significance. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 181–190.
9.
PaunonenS. V. (1988). Trait relevance and the differential predictability of behavior. Journal of Personality, 56, 599–620.
10.
SedneyM. A. (1981). Comments on median split procedures for scoring androgyny measures. Sex Roles, 7, 217–222.
