Techniques for creating collaborative student-constructed hypertexts in the classroom are described. The goals of the exercise were to facilitate student-directed learning by doing, help students learn to apply courseware development theory, teach specific computer skills, and promote critical thinking by having students link critical concepts in a hypertext environment. Critical thinking is discussed in terms of informal reasoning and ill-structured problem solving. The contexts were two undergraduate courses on cognition and computer-assisted learning. Students' separate papers were integrated to form the group hypertext. Hypercard procedures for creating the background, text blocks, and button links are presented. An approach to hypertext construction management called a Linking Priority Structure is described, along with two management rules, and a hypertext scavenger hunt. The exercise was evaluated through the success of the scavenger hunt and students' written comments. Strengths and weaknesses of the homespun hypertext are valuable sources of learning.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlschulerL. (1989). Hand-crafted hypertext—Lessons from the ACM experiment. In BarrettE.The society of text; Hypertext, hypermedia, and the social construction of information (pp. 343–361). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2.
BalajthyE. (1990). Hypertext, hypermedia, and metacognition: Research and instructional implications for disabled readers. Journal of Reading, Writing, and Learning Disabilities, 6, 183–202.
3.
BrockmannR. J.HortonW.BrockK. (1989). From database to hypertext via electronic publishing: An information odyssey. In BarrettE.The society of text: Hypertext, hypermedia, and the social construction of information (pp. 162–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
CarrK. S. (1988). How can we teach critical thinking? Childhood Education, 65, 69–73.
5.
CharneyD. (in press). The impact of hypertext on processes of reading and writing. In HilligossS. J.SelfeC. L., Literacy and computers. New York: Modern Language Association.
6.
DelanyP.LandowG. P. (1991). Hypermedia and literary studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7.
DickeyW. (1991). Poem descending a staircase: Hypertext and simultaneity of experience. In DelanyP.LandowG. P.Hypermedia and literary studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
DoughertyT. J. (1990). Contour: A hypermedia environment for teaching about subjective contours and other visual illusions. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 22, 223–227.
9.
FergusonN. B. L. (1986). Encouraging responsibility, active participation, and critical thinking in general psychology students. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 217–218.
10.
GarrisonD. R. (1992). Critical thinking and self-directed learning in adult education: An analysis of responsibility and control issues. Adult Education Quarterly, 42, 136–148.
11.
GrayS. H. (1990). Using protocol analysis and drawings to study mental model construction during hypertext navigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interactions, 2, 359–378.
12.
GrayS. H.ShashaD. (1989). To link or not to link: Empirical guidance for the design of nonlinear text systems. Behavior Research, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 326–333.
13.
HalpernD. F. (1989). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
14.
HewettT. T. (1989). The Drexel disk: Hypertext-based instructional software as a tool for the exploration of a constrained space. Behavior Research, Instruments, & Computers, 21, 316–325.
15.
HigginsK.BooneR. (1990). Hypertext computer study guides and the social studies achievement of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23, 529–540.
16.
HudginsB. B.RiesenmyM.EbelD.EdelmanS. (1989). Children's critical thinking: A model for its analysis and two examples. Journal of Educational Research, 82, 327–338.
17.
IrishP. M.TriggR. H. (1989). Supporting collaboration in hypermedia: Issues and experiences. In BarrettE.The society of text: Hypertext, hypermedia, and the social construction of information (pp. 90–106). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18.
JonassenD. H. (1988). Integrating learning strategies into courseware to facilitate deeper processing. In JonassenD. H.Instructional design for microcomputer software (pp. 151–181). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
KolbD. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20.
LandowG. P. (1991). The rhetoric of hypermedia: Some rules for authors. In DelanyP.LandowG. P.Hypermedia and literary studies (pp. 81–103). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
LandowG. P.DelanyP. (1991). Hypertext, hypermedia, and literary studies: The state of the art. In DelanyP.LandowG. P.Hypermedia and literary studies (pp. 3–5). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
RaoU.TuroffM. (1990). Hypertext functionality: A theoretical framework. International Journal of Human-Computer Interactions, 2, 333–357.
24.
ReboyL. M.SembG. B. (1991). PSI and critical thinking: Compatibility or irreconcilable differences? Teaching of Psychology, 18, 212–215.
25.
ThomasB. B. (1992). Cooperative learning in the elementary education classroom: Learning by experiencing. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 19, 9–12.
26.
VossJ. F.WolfeC. R.LawrenceJ. A.EngleR. A. (1991). From representation to decision: An analysis of problem solving in international relations. In StembergR. J.FrenschP. A.Complex problem solving: Principles and mechanisms (pp. 119–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
