Literacy and informed decision making in an uncertain world require the ability to reason statistically. However, research indicates that, although conceptions of statistics and probability have steadily advanced within scientific and mathematical communities, adults in mainstream American society cannot think probalnlistically or statisticaly about important societal issues. This problem is addressed through implementation and evaluation of a novel statistics course for students who are teachers or are considering a career in teaching. The course is designed to help students use statistical concepts as tools for social reasoning within simulations of real-world problem situations. The course is unique because of its connections with the community and its commitment to achieving a high degree of authenticity through simulations of realistic social problem solving.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BransfordJ. D.SteinB. S. (1993). The ideal problem solver (2nd ed.). New York: Freeman.
2.
BrownA. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In WeinertF.KleweR.Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 65–116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA.DuguidP. (1989). Debating the situation: A rejoinder to Palincsar and Wineburg. Educational Researcher, 18 (1) 10–12.
4.
CohenL. J. (1981). Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 317–370.
5.
ConfryJ. (1991). Steering a course between Vygotsky and Piaget. Educational Researcher, 20 (8) 28–34.
6.
De BonoE. (1973–75). CoRT thinking. Blandford, Dorset, UK: Director Education Services Limited.
7.
DeweyJ. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier.
8.
FlavellJ. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of psychological inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.
9.
HackingI. (1975). The emergence of probability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10.
InhelderB.PiagetJ. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books.
11.
KonoldC. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.
12.
KuhnD. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674–689.
13.
KuhnD. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
KuhnD.AmselE.O'LoughlinM. (1988). The development of scientific thinking skills. San Diego: Academic.
15.
LaveJ. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In ResnickL.LevineJ.TeasleyS.Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63–82). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
16.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17.
LesgoldA. (1992). Process control for educating a smart work force. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center.
18.
LesgoldA. (1993). Information technology and the future of education. In LajoteS.DerryS.Computers as cognitive tools (pp. 369–383). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19.
LevinJ. R. (1982). Modifications of a regression-toward-the-mean demonstration. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 237–238.
20.
LevinJ. R. (1993). An improved modification of a regression-toward-the-mean demonstration. American Statistician, 47, 24–26.
21.
NichollsJ. G.NelsonJ. R. (1992). Students' conceptions of controversial knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 224–230.
PorterT. M. (1986). The rise of statistical thinking. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
ResnickL. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13–20.
25.
RossJ. A.CousinsJ. B. (1993). Patterns of student growth in reasoning about correlational problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 49–65.
26.
SaxeG. B. (1988). Candy selling and math learning. Educational Researcher, 17, 14–21.
27.
ShaughnessyJ. M. (1992). Research in probability and statistics: Reflections and directions. In GrouwsD. A.Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 465–494). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
28.
SingerJ. D.WillettJ. B. (1990). Improving the teaching of applied statistics: Putting the data back into data analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 44, 223–230.
29.
SnellJ. L.FinnJ. (1992). A course called “chance.”Chance, 5 (3–4) 12–16.
30.
SwellerJ.CooperG. A. (1985). The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 59–89.
31.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
32.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. Journal of Research on Mathematics Education, Monograph #4. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
33.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Edited by ColeM.SteinerJohn V.ScribnerS.SoubermanE.. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
WalesC. E.NardiA. (1984). Successful decision-making. Morgantown: West Virginia University, Center for Guided Design.
35.
WinogradT.FloresF. (1986). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
