Abstract
Full-time faculty (N = 287) at two universities were interviewed by telephone regarding their use of and rationales for extra credit. Extra credit was offered in 13% of undergraduate courses. Frequent justifications for extra credit were that it provided alternative means for evaluation, motivated students, and allowed a second chance for mastery. The most common argument against extra credit was that an equal opportunity must be provided for all students, not for a select few. The probabilities of faculty offering extra credit in six specific situations are also presented; however, an instructor's general attitude toward extra credit, rather than the circumstances of the individual case, largely determined whether it was provided.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
