This article describes a research paradigm for use in undergraduate laboratory experiments on social influence. The method is adapted from White (1975), who compared the responses of control subjects on a survey question to those of experimental subjects who were first exposed to the contrived responses of others to the same question. I review how students in an undergraduate social psychology laboratory use this method, demonstrate the reliability of the influence effect obtained, and discuss the educational value of this research paradigm.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1985). The historical background of social psychology. In LindzeyG.AronsonE.The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 1. Theory and method (pp. 1–46). New York: Random House.
2.
AschS. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.
3.
ChamberlainK. (1988). Devising relevant and topical undergraduate laboratory projects: The core article approach. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 207–208.
4.
FestingerL. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
5.
GoffmanE. (1955). On face-work: An analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. Psychology, 18, 213–231.
6.
KingM.ZieglerM. (1975). Research projects in social psychology. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
7.
MilgramS. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper & Row.
8.
MooreH. T. (1921). The comparative influence of majority and expert opinion. American Journal of Psychology, 32, 16–20.
9.
PaichelerG. (1988). The psychology of social influence. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
10.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
11.
RhodesN.WoodW. (1992). Self-esteem and intelligence affect influenceability: The mediating role of message reception. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 156–171.
12.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
13.
TurnerJ. C. (1991). Social influence. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
14.
WhiteG. M. (1975). Contextual determinants of opinion judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1047–1054.
