Using Feature Films as Tools for Analysis in a Psychology and Law Course

Abstract

Two types of in-class discussions using feature films to stimulate discussion in a law and psychology course are described. In the first discussion, students identify legal doctrines and research findings relevant to the films, and they critique the accuracy of the films' representation of this material. The second discussion requires students to analyze the psycholegal issues the films evoke, critique the films' presentation of the issues, and evaluate their impact on the students' own positions. Participation in the discussions is intended to increase active learning and improve critical thinking. Using films may also improve students' perspective-taking skills. The subjectivity of films is one source of their attractiveness as teaching tools, but it also poses some educational risks.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benjamin

L. T.

Jr . (1991). Personalization and active learning in the large introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 18, 68–74.

Bolt

(1976). Using films based on literature in teaching psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 3, 189–190.

Coblenz

(Producer) Becker

(Director) . (1979). The onion field [Film]. Hollywood, CA: Embassy.

Costin

(1982). Some thoughts on general education and the teaching of undergraduate psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 9, 26–28.

Costin

(1985). Courage in the classroom. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 125–128.

Dorris

Ducey

(1978). Social psychology and sex roles in films. Teaching of Psychology, 5, 168–169.

Fleming

M. Z.

Piedmont

R. L

Hiam

C. M.

(1990). Images of madness: Feature films in teaching psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 17, 185–187.

Horowitz

I. A.

Willging

T. E.

(1984). The psychology of law: Integrations and applications. Boston: Little, Brown.

Kinney

D. K.

(1975). Cinema thrillers: Reviews of films highly rated by psychology students. Teaching of Psychology, 2, 183–186.

10.

Liss

M. B.

(1988). Psychology of law syllabi (2nd ed.). San Bernardino, CA: APA Division 41-American Psychology-Law Society.

11.

Low

P. W.

Jeffries

J. C

Jr. Bonnie

R. J.

(1986). The trial of John W. Hinckley, Jr.: A case study in the insanity defense. Mineola, NY: Foundation Press.

12.

Miller

(1987). Classification of psychopathology according to a scientific (psychology and psychiatry) and an artistic (film noir) perspective. Psychological Reports, 61, 287–299.

13.

Nissim-Sabat

(1979). The teaching of abnormal psychology through the cinema. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 121–123.

14.

Phillips

(Producers) Scorsese

(Director) . (1976). Taxi driver [Film]. Burbank, CA: Columbia.

15.

Streisand

(Producer) Ritt

(Director) . (1987). Nuts [Film]. Hollywood, CA: Warner Brothers.

16.

Tversky

Kahneman

(1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.