Effect of Class Standing on Students' Predictions of Their Final Exam Scores

Abstract

Ninety undergraduate introductory psychology students predicted their numerical scores on a multiple-choice final exam directly before the exam was passed out (pretest prediction) and just after completing the exam (posttest prediction). Based on their all-but-final-exam point totals, students were ranked with respect to class standing and categorized as above average (top third), average (middle third), or below average (bottom third). Below average students significantly overestimated their final exam scores on both pretest (9.47%) and posttest (7.73%) predictions. Average students significantly overestimated their scores on pretest (5.33%) but not posttest (2.13%) predictions. Above average students, however, were fairly accurate for both types of prediction, slightly but not significantly underestimating (about 2%) their exam scores.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Boud

Falchikov

(1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529–549.

Cochran

S. B.

Spears

M. C.

(1980). Student self-assessment and instructors' ratings: A comparison. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 76, 253–257.

Cowan

(1988). Struggling with self-assessment. In Boud

D. J.

(Ed.), Developing student autonomy in learning (pp. 192–210). London: Kogan Page.

Craik

F. I. M.

Lockhart

R. S.

(1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.

Doleys

E. J.

Renzaglia

G. A.

(1963). Accuracy of student prediction of college grades. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 41, 528–530.

Falchikov

(1986). Product comparisons and process benefits of collaborative peer group and self-assessments. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 11, 146–166.

Falchikov

Boud

(1989). Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 59, 395–430.

Hyde

T. S.

Jenkins

J. J.

(1969). Differential effects of incidental tasks on the organization of recall of a list of highly associated words. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 82, 472–481.

Hyde

T. S.

Jenkins

J.J

. (1973). Recall for words as a function of semantic, graphic, and syntactic orienting tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 471–480.

10.

Mueller

R. H.

(1970). Is self-grading the answer? Journal of Higher Education, 41, 221–224.

11.

Murstein

B. I.

(1965). The relationship of grade expectations and grades believed to be deserved to actual grades received. Journal of Experimental Education, 33, 357–362.

12.

Shaughnessy

J. J.

(1979). Confidence-judgment accuracy as a predictor of test performance. Journal of Research in Personality, 13, 505–514.

13.

Skinner

B. F.

(1958). Teaching machines. Science, 128, 969–977.

14.

Sumner

F. C.

(1932). Marks as estimated by students. Education, 32, 429.

15.

Winer

B. J.

(1971). Statistical principles in experimental design (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

16.

Zechmeister

E. B.

Nyberg

S. E.

(1982). Human memory. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.