Historical awareness of psychology majors and faculty members was assessed using a name recognition questionnaire, which included the names of 53 eminent contributors in the history of psychology. Before taking a course in the history of psychology, students showed a low level of name recognition, which was markedly inferior to that of faculty members. It appears that, without explicit instruction, students acquire little knowledge of the history of their discipline.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnninE. LBoringE. G.WatsonR. I. (1968). Important psychologists, 1600–1967. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 4, 303–315.
2.
DuncanC. P. (1976). Recognition of names of famous psychologists. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 12, 325–329.
3.
HenleM. (1976). Why study the history of psychology?Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 270, 14–20.
4.
PunchesA.VineyW. (1986). A note on the historical literacy of first-year graduate students in psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 22, 64–65.
5.
RaphelsonA. C. (1982). The history course as the capstone of the psychology curriculum. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 18, 279–285.
6.
RobinsonD. N. (1979). The history of psychology and the ends of instruction. Teaching of Psychology, 6, 4–6.
7.
WatsonR. I. (1960). The history of psychology: A neglected area. American Psychologist, 15, 251–255.
8.
WatsonR. I. (1966). The role and use of history in the psychology curriculum. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2, 64–69.
9.
WertheimerM. (1980). Historical research—Why? In BrozekJ.PongratzL. J. (Eds.), Historiography of modem psychology (pp. 323). Toronto: Hogrefe.
