This article outlines three activities that demonstrate common perceptual errors described in the social psychological literature: the actor-observer effect, the false consensus bias, and priming effects. These activities produce consistent results and demonstrate how cognitive shortcuts can result in inaccurate judgments. These simple demonstrations can also stimulate discussion of the bases of such miscalculations and their impact on everyday thinking.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarghJ. A.PietromonacoP. (1982). Automatic information processing and social perception: The influence of trait information presented outside of conscious awareness on impression formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 750–760.
2.
DevineP. G. (1989). Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 5–18.
3.
DunnD. S. (1989). Demonstrating a self-serving bias. Teaching of Psychology, 16, 21–22.
4.
DursoF. T.MellgrenR. L. (1989). Thinking about research: Methods and tactics of the behavioral scientist. St. Paul: West.
5.
FunderD. C. (1987). Errors and mistakes: Evaluating the accuracy of social judgment. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 75–90.
6.
HigginsE. T.RholesC. R.JonesC. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 141–154.
7.
HoganR.DeSotoC. B.SolanoC. (1977). Traits, tests, and personality research. American Psychologist, 32, 255–264.
8.
LasswellM. E.RuchF. LGorfeinD. S.WarrenN. (1981). Person perception. In BenjaminL. T.Jr.LowmanK. D. (Eds.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 185–187). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
9.
MullenB.AtkinsJ. L.ChampionD. S.EdwardsC.HardyD.StoryJ. E.VanderklokM. (1985). The false consensus effect: A meta-analysis of 115 hypothesis tests. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 262–283.
10.
MyersD. G. (1990). Social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11.
NisbettR. E.CaputoC.LegantP.MarecekJ. (1973). Behavior as seen by the actor and as seen by the observer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 154–164.
12.
NisbettR. E.RossL. (1980). Human inference: Strategies and shortcomings of social judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13.
PigottM.LeoneC. (1990). Instructor's manual to accompany Brehm and Kassin's social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
14.
RossL.GreeneD.HouseP. (1977). The “false consensus effect”: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 279–301.
15.
TverskyA.KahnemanD. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.
16.
WatsonD. L. (1987a). The primacy effect in social judgments. In MakoskyV. P.WhittemoreL. G.RogersA. M. (Eds.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 132–134). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
17.
WatsonD. L. (1987b). The fundamental attribution error. In MakoskyV. P.WhittemoreL. G.RogersA. M. (Eds.), Activities handbook for the teaching of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 135–137). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18.
WyerR. S.SrullT. K. (1981). Category accessibility: Some theoretical and empirical issues concerning the processing of social stimulus information. In HigginsE. T.HermanC. P.ZannaM. P. (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 161–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
