McDonald and Peterson (this issue) criticize my suggestion that introductory experimental psychology students be taught the importance of accuracy by giving them an A or F for the results sections of laboratory reports. However, the empirical basis for their objections has little relevance, and classroom observations demonstrate the beneficial results of appropriate use of reinforcement and punishment principles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AmesC. (1984). Achievement attributions and self-instruction under competitive and individualistic goal structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 478–489.
2.
AzrinN. H.HolzW. C. (1966). Punishment. In HonigW. K. (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 380–447). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3.
CovingtonM. V. (1984). The motive for self-worth. In AmesR.AmesC. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1. pp. 77–113). New York: Academic.
4.
Cronan-HillixT. (1988). Teaching students the importance of accuracy in research. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 205–207.
5.
deCharmsR. (1972). Personal causation training in the schools. Journal of Applied Social Psychobgy, 2, 95–113.
6.
McDonaldC. S.PetersonK. A. (this issue). Teaching commitment to accuracy in research: Comment on Cronan-Hillix (1988). Teaching of Psychology, 18, 100–101.
7.
NicholsJ. G. (1989). The competitive ethos and democratic education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
SlavinR. E. (1987). Mastery learning reconsidered. Review of Educational Research, 57, 175–213.
