Introductory psychology students were told that their instructor had telepathic powers. The instructor demonstrated these “psychic” abilities by transmitting various images into the minds of the students and a confederate. Students generated alternative hypotheses to account for the phenomena and designed methods to test their hypotheses. This article describes the methods used to perform the psychic acts and outlines the structure of the hypothesis-testing activity. By allowing students to experience firsthand the importance of the rules of science, this instructional method may encourage greater scientific skepticism than dose the direct teaching of the falseness of pseudoscientific claims.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanzigerG. (1983). Normalizing the paranormal: Short-term and long-term change in belief in the paranormal among older learners during a short course. Teaching of Psychology, 10, 212–214.
2.
BatesJ. A. (1987). Degrees of scientific literacy and intellec-tualism among students in a college of education. The Foundations Monthly Newsletter, 4, 7–9.
3.
EveR. A.HarroldF. B. (1986). Creationism, cult archaeology, and other pseudoscientific beliefs: A study of college students. Youth and Society, 17, 396–421.
4.
FederK. L. (1986). The challenge of pseudoscience. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26, 180–186.
5.
GrayT. (1984). University course reduces belief in paranormal. The Skeptical Inquirer, 8, 247–251.
6.
HarroldF. B.EveR. A. (1986). Noah's ark and ancient astronauts: Pseudoscientific beliefs about the past among a sample of college students. The Skeptical Inquirer, 11, 61–75.
7.
HoffmasterS. (1986). Pseudoscience: Teaching by counterexample. Journal of College Science Teaching, 26, 432–436.
8.
MarksD.KammannR. (1980). The psychology of the psychic. Buffalo: Prometheus Books.
9.
MillerJ. D. (1987, June). The scientifically illiterate. American Demographics, pp. 26–31.
