Although the operant approach to psychology is based on objective empirical observations and is descriptive in nature, much of psychology is filled with subjective, interpretive terminology. Such terminology produces confusion over the definitions of basic operant concepts. We suggest a solution that defines the concepts of positive and negative reinforcements and punishments in an objective fashion. Our 2 × 2 matrix avoids the subjective terminology often used in such matrices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BenjaminL. T.HopkinsJ. R.Jr.NationJ. R. (1987). Psychology.New York: Macmillan.
2.
MazurJ. E. (1986). Learning and behavior.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
3.
MorseW. H.KelleherR. T. (1977). Determinants of reinforcement and punishment. In HonigW. K.StaddonJ. E. R. (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 174–200). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
O'LearyK. D.KaufmanK. F.KassR. E.DrabmanR. S. (1970). The effects of loud and soft reprimands on the behavior of disruptive students. Exceptional Children, 37, 145–155.
5.
PettijohnT. F. (1987). Psychology: A concise introduction.Guilford, CT: Dushkin.
6.
SkinnerB. F. (1984). Operant behavior. In CorsiniR. J. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 462–463). New York: Wiley.
7.
TauberR. T. (1988). Overcoming misunderstanding about the concept of negative reinforcement. Teaching of Psychology, 15, 152–153.
