This article describes a system for graduate students to evaluate faculty in their roles as advisers and mentors. Some of the benefits of the system and some suggestions for encouraging the development of good mentor–protégé relationships are also mentioned.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BickmanL. (Ed.). (1987). Proceedings of the National Conference on Graduate Education in Psychology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, June 13–19, 1987 [Special issue]. American Psychologist, 42(12).
2.
CraneD. (1965). Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition. American Sociological Review, 30, 699–714.
3.
Cronan-HillixT.GensheimerL. K.Cronan-HillixW. A.DavidsonW. S. (1986). Students' views of mentors in psychology graduate training. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 123–127.
4.
LongJ. S. (1978). Productivity and academic position in the scientific career. American Sociological Review, 43, 889–908.
5.
ReskinB. F. (1979). Academic sponsorship and scientists' careers. Sociology of Education, 52, 129–146.
6.
RocheG. R. (1979). Much ado about mentors. Harvard Business Review, 57(1), 14–28.
