Controlling for possible confoundings in a recent study (Carstens & Beck, 1986), we found that completing a high school psychology class was not related to performance in a college introductory psychology course but a strong background in high school natural science was related to higher grades in the course, especially in the section dealing with topics closely related to natural science. An explanation in terms of the congruence of the scientific–experimental focus of the natural science courses and the college psychology course is suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrinkJ. (1986). Test bank to accompany Myers: Psychology.New York: Worth.
2.
CarstensC. B.BeckH. P. (1986). The relationship of high school psychology and natural science courses to performance in a college introductory psychology class. Teaching of Psychology, 13, 116–118.
3.
GriggsR. A.RansdellS. E. (1987). Misconceptions tests or misconceived tests?Teaching of Psychology, 14, 210–214.
4.
HedgesB. W.ThomasJ. H. (1980). The effect of high school psychology on pre-course knowledge, midterm grades, and final grades in introductory psychology. Teaching of Psychology, 7, 221–223.
5.
KornbrotD. E. (1987). Science and psychology degree performance. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, 409–417.
6.
MyersD. G. (1986). Psychology.New York: Worth.
7.
RaglandR. G. (1987, August). The status of teachers and teacher education in high school psychology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, New York.
8.
ScheirerC. J.RogersA. M. (1985). The undergraduate psychology curriculum: 1984.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
