Using this exercise, students recompute the values of statistical tests published in journal articles, and the recomputed values are compared to the published results. My experience with one undergraduate and one graduate class suggests that errors in statistical results published in professional journals may be more common than is generally believed. Recalculations indicated that approximately 13% of the results reported as statistically significant were not. Some possible reasons for the discrepancies between published and recomputed values are discussed, as are students' reactions to the exercise.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnwellG. M. (1984). The multiple benefits of a research literature exercise. Teaching of Statistics in the Health Sciences, 38, 5–7.
2.
CooperH. M. (1984). The integrative research interview: A systematic approach.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
3.
FienbergS. E.MartinM. E.StrafM. L. (Eds.). (1985). Sharing research data.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
GordonL. V. (1973). One-way analysis of variance using means and standard deviations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 33, 815–816.
5.
HuckS. W.MalgadyR. G. (1978). Two-way analysis of variance using means and standard deviations. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 235–237.
6.
HunterJ. E.SchmidtF. L.JacksonG. B. (1982). Metaanalysis: Cumulating research findings across studies.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
7.
JacobH. (1984). Using published data: Errors and remedies.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8.
KielcoltK. J.NathanL. E. (1985). Secondary analysis of survey data.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
9.
LightR. J.PillemerD. B. (1984). Summing up: The science of reviewing research.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
RosenthalR. (1978). How often are our numbers wrong?American Psychologist, 33, 1005–1008.
11.
RosenthalR. (1984). Meta-analytic procedures for social research.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
12.
RossiJ. S. (in press). One-way ANOVA from summary statistics. Educational and Psychological Measurement..
13.
WolfF. M. (1986). Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis.Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.