Students' Ratings of College Teaching: A Social Validation

Abstract

This investigation was conducted to demonstrate the applicability of social validation procedures to students' ratings of college teaching. The premise of social validation is that criteria should include items that are meaningful and important to consumers. This study is unique in that the criterion was based entirely on students' ideas about effective teaching. Results indicated that there was a significant canonical correlation between four scores from a conventional instrument and two socially valid criteria (Rc = .83). However, there were also important differences between the two measures. In particular, the socially valid instrument contained many items describing teachers' interpersonal behavior and presentation of class material, but only one item reflecting subject mastery. These results suggest that social validation procedures are applicable to and important for the evaluation of college teaching.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Arnold

J. D.

Cunningham

T. F.

Makosky

V. P.

McGrevy

D. G.

Ross

J. A.

Searleman

(1985). Students' long-term evaluation of introductory psychology: How psychology compares with other introductory courses. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 139–142.

Burdsal

C. A.

Bardo

J. W.

(1986). Measuring students' perceptions of teaching: Dimensions of evaluation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 63–79.

Cohen

P. A.

(1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research, 51, 281–309.

Erdle

Murray

H. G.

Rushton

J. P.

(1985). Personality, classroom behavior, and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 394–407.

Frey

P. W.

(1978). A two-dimensional analysis of student ratings of instruction. Research in Higher Education, 9, 69–91.

Kazdin

A. E.

(1977). Assessing the clinical or applied importance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–451.

Lowman

(1984). Mastering the techniques of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Marsh

H. W.

(1984). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707–754.

McKeachie

W. J.

(1979). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe, 65, 384–397.

10.

Meredith

G. M.

(1983). Diagnostic value of composite student-based ratings of instruction. Psychological Reports, 52, 549–550.

11.

Meredith

G. M.

(1985). Two rating indicators of excellence in teaching in lecture-format courses. Psychological Reports, 56, 52–54.

12.

Mintzes

J. J.

(1979). Overt teaching behaviors and student ratings of instructors. Journal of Experimental Education, 48, 145–153.

13.

Runco

M. A.

(1984). Teachers' judgments of creativity and social validation of divergent thinking test. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 59, 711–717.

14.

Runco

M. A.

Schreibman

(1983). Parental judgments of behavior therapy efficacy with autistic children: A social validation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 13, 237–248.

15.

Runco

M. A.

Schreibman

(in press). Socially validating the objectives of behavior therapy with autistic children. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders..

16.

Schreibman

Runco

M. A.

Mills

J. I.

Koegel

R. L.

(1982). Teachers' judgments of improvements in autistic children in behavior therapy: A social validation. In Koegel

R. L.

Rincover

Egel

A. W.

(Eds.), Educating and understanding autistic children (pp. 78–87). Houston, TX: College Hill.

17.

Wolf

M. M.

(1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement, or how applied behavior therapy is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–214.