The field of psychology has paid little attention to the most crucial issue facing our world: the threat of nuclear devastation. We propose that psychology teachers help to promote a more active consideration of psychology and peace/war in the nuclear age by including the topic in their courses. We suggest specific ways to incorporate this issue into psychology courses, with special reference to courses in social psychology and personality.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BanduraA. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
2.
BanduraA.UnderwoodB.FromsonM. E. (1975). Disinhibition of aggression through diffusion of responsibility and dehumanization of victims. Journal of Research in Personality, 9, 253–269.
3.
BerkowitzL. (1962). Aggression: A social psychology analysis.New York: McGraw-Hill.
4.
BronfenbrennerU. (1961). The mirror-image in Soviet-American relations: A social psychologist's report. Journal of Social Issues, 16(3), 45–56.
5.
ColesR. (1986). The political life of children.Boston: Atlantic Monthly Press.
6.
CunninghamF. B. (1984). A middle school approach to peace education. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 334–336.
7.
DavidsonL. M.BaumA. (1985). Implications of posttraumatic stress for social psychology. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 207–232.
8.
deRiveraJ. (1984). Facing nuclear weapons. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 739–756.
9.
DeutschM. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
DeutschM. (1980). Fifty years of conflict. In FestingerL. (Ed.), Retrospections on social psychology (pp. 46–77). New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
DeutschM. (1983a). Conflict resolution: Theory and practice. Political Psychology, 4, 431–453.
12.
DeutschM. (1983b). The prevention of World War III: A psychological perspective. Political Psychology, 4, 3–31.
13.
Education and the threat of nuclear war [Special issue]. (1984). Harvard Educational Review, 54(3).
14.
EriksonE. H. (1950). Childhood and society.New York: Norton.
15.
EriksonE. H. (1969). Gandhi's truth.New York: Norton.
16.
EscalonaS. K. (1982). Growing up with the threat of nuclear war: Some indirect effects on personality development. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 600–607.
17.
EtzioniA. (1967). The Kennedy experiment. Western Political Science Quarterly, 20, 361–380.
18.
FeshbachS. (1986). Implications for changing war-related attitudes. In WhiteR. K. (Ed.), Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war (pp. 527–529). New York: New York University Press.
19.
FeshbachS.KandelE.HaistF. (1985). Attitudes toward nuclear armament policies: An example of social research in behalf of social advocacy. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 107–126.
20.
FischoffB.LichtensteinS.SlovicP.DerbyS. L.KeeneyR. L. (1981). Acceptable risk.New York: Cambridge University Press.
21.
FisherR.UryW. (1981). Getting to yes.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
22.
FiskeS. T.FischoffB.MilburnM. A. (1983). Images of nuclear war [Entire issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 39(1).
23.
FrankJ. D. (1967). Sanity and survival: Psychological aspects of war and peace.New York: Vintage Books.
24.
FrankJ. D. (1986). The role of pride. In WhiteR. K. (Ed.), Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war (pp. 220–226). New York: New York University Press.
25.
FreudS. (1964). Why war? In BramsonL.GoethalsG. W. (Eds.), War: Studies from psychology, sociology, and anthropology (pp. 71–80). New York: Basic Books.
26.
FrommE. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness.New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
GeorgeA. L.GeorgeJ. L. (1956). Woodrow Wilson and Colonel House: A personality study.New York: Dover.
28.
GladB. (1980). Jimmy Carter in search of the great White House.New York: Norton.
29.
GordonE. W. (Ed.). (1982). Forum on the psychological effects of preparing for nuclear war. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 580–645.
30.
GreeningT. (Ed.). (1984). Special peace issue [Entire issue]. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 24(3).
31.
HolstiO. R. (1980). Crisis, stress, and decision-making. In FalkR. A.KimS. S. (Eds.), The war system: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 491–508). Boulder, CO: Westview.
32.
HovlandC.JanisI.KelleyH. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion.New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
Is nuclear war scaring kids to death? (1984, December 9). Newsday, p. 15.
34.
JanisI. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
35.
JanisI. L. (1985). International crisis management in the nuclear age. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 63–86.
36.
JanisI. L.FeshbachS. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78–92.
37.
JervisR. (1976). Perception and misperception in international politics.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
38.
JervisR. (1985). Perceiving and coping with threat. In JervisR.LebowR. N.SteinJ. G., Psychology and deterrence (pp. 13–33). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
39.
JervisR.LebowR. N.SteinJ. G. (1985). Psychology and deterrence.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
40.
KahnemanD.SlovicP.TverskyA. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases.New York: Cambridge University Press.
41.
KelmanH. C. (1985). Overcoming the psychological barrier: An analysis of the Egyptian-Israeli peace process. Negotiation Journal, 1, 213–234.
42.
KelmanH. C.CohenS. P. (1979). Reduction of international conflict: An interactional approach. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 288–303). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
43.
KimS. S. (1976). The Lorenzian theory of aggression and peace research: A critique. Journal of Peace Research, 13, 253–276.
44.
KimmelP. R. (1985). Learning about peace: Choices and the U.S. Academy of Peace as seen from two different perspectives. American Psychologist, 40, 536–541.
45.
KlinebergO. (1984). Public opinion and nuclear war. American Psychologist, 39, 1245–1253.
46.
KohlbergL. (1964). The development of moral character and moral ideology. In HoffmanM. L.HoffmanL. W. (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 1, pp. 383–431). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
47.
KramerB. M. (1985). Nuclear psychology: A preliminary bibliography. (Available from KramerBernard M., Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts/Boston, Dorchester, MA 02125).
48.
KramerB. M.KalickS. M.MilburnM. A. (1983). Attitudes toward nuclear weapons and nuclear war: 1945–1982. Journal of Social Issues, 39(1), 7–24.
49.
LebowR. N. (1985). Conclusions. In JervisR.LebowR. N.SteinJ. G., Psychology and deterrence (pp. 203–232). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
50.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world.New York: Plenum.
51.
LiftonR. J. (1967). Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima.New York: Random House.
52.
LiftonR. J.FalkR. (1982). Indefensible weapons: The political and psychological case against nuclearism.New York: Basic-Books.
53.
LordC. G.RossL.LepperM. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effect of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 2098–2109.
54.
LorenzK. Z. (1966). On aggression.New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
55.
MackJ. E.SnowR. (1986). Psychological effects on children and adolescents. In WhiteR. K. (Ed.), Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war (pp. 16–33). New York: New York University Press.
56.
MacyJ. R. (1983). Despair and personal power in the nuclear age.Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.
57.
MaslowA. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being.New York: Van Nostrand.
58.
MontvilleJ. V. (Ed.). (1985). A notebook on the psychology of the U.S.-Soviet relationship [Special issue). Political Psychology, 6(2).
59.
MoyerR. S. (1985a, January). The enemy within: Psychological threats to real security. Psychology Today, pp. 30–37.
60.
MoyerR. S. (1985b). Teaching psychology courses about the nuclear arms race. (Available from MoyerRobert S., Department of Psychology, Bates College, Lewiston, ME 04240).
61.
NelsonA. (1985). Psychological equivalence: Awareness and response-ability in our nuclear age. American Psychologist, 40, 549–556.
62.
NevinJ. A. (1985). Behavior analysis, the nuclear arms race, and the peace movement. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 27–44.
63.
OsgoodC. E. (1962). An alternative to war or surrender.Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
64.
OskampS. (Ed.). (1985). International conflict and national public policy issues [Special issue]. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6.
65.
OskampS.KingJ. C.BurnS. M.KonradA. M.PollardJ. A.WhiteM. A. (1985). The media and nuclear war: Fallout from TV's “The Day After.”Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 127–158.
66.
PlousS.ZimbardoP. G. (1984, November). The looking glass war. Psychology Today, pp. 48–52, 54, 56, 59.
67.
PostJ. M. (1983). Woodrow Wilson re-examined: The mind-body controversy redux and other disputations. Political Psychology, 4, 289–306.
68.
PruittD. G.RubinJ. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement.New York: Random House.
69.
Psychology in the public forum. (1985). American Psychologist, 40, 531–560.
70.
Rogers calls peace results ‘surprising.’ (1984, November). APA Monitor, p. 15.
71.
RogersC. R.RybackD. (1984). One alternative to nuclear planetary suicide. The Counseling Psychologist, 12, 3–12.
72.
RogersR. W.MewbornC. R. (1976). Fear appeals and attitude change: Effects of a threat's noxiousness, probability of occurrence, and the efficacy of coping responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 54–61.
73.
RosenblattR. (1985). Witness: The world since Hiroshima.Boston: Little, Brown.
74.
RubinsteinJ.SlifeB. D. (1984). Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial psychological issues (3rd ed.). Guilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing Group.
75.
SchofieldJ.PavelchakM. (1985). The day after: The impact of a media event. American Psychologist, 40, 542–548.
76.
SchwebelM. (1982). Effects of the nuclear war threat on children and teenagers: Implications for professionals. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 608–618.
77.
SeligmanM. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development, and death.San Francisco: Freeman.
78.
SherifM. (1965). Superordinate goals in the reduction of intergroup conflict: An experimental evaluation. In SchwebelM. (Ed.), Behavioral science and human survival (pp. 167–174). Palo Alto, CA: Science & Behavior Books.
79.
SkinnerB. F. (1948). Walden two.New York: Macmillan.
80.
SkinnerB. F. (1985). Toward the cause of peace: What can psychology contribute?Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 21–25.
81.
SmokeR. (1977). War: Controlling escalation.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
82.
SmokeR. (1984). The ‘peace’ of deterrence and the ‘peace’ of the antinuclear war movement. Political Psychology, 5, 741–748.
83.
SnowR.GoodmanL. (1984). A decisionmaking approach to nuclear education. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 321–328.
84.
TegerA. I. (1980). Too much invested to quit.New York: Pergamon.
85.
ThompsonJ. A. (1985). Psychological aspects of nuclear war.Chichester: The British Psychological Society.
86.
ThurlowS. (1982). Nuclear war in human perspective: A survivor's report. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52, 638–645.
87.
Union of Concerned Scientists, Massachusetts Teachers Association, and National Education Association. (1983). Choices: A unit in conflict and nuclear war.Washington, DC: National Education Association.
88.
VolkanV. D. (1985). The need to have enemies and allies: A developmental approach. Political Psychology, 6, 219–247.
89.
WagnerR. V. (1985). Psychology and the threat of nuclear war. American Psychologist, 40, 531–535.
90.
WagnerR. V.MoyerR. S. (in press). Psychology and the nuclear threat. In RubinZ.McNeilE. B., Advancing psychology.New York: Harper & Row.
91.
WalshR. (1984). Staying alive: The psychology of human survival.Boulder, CO: New Science Library.
92.
WaterlowC. (1984). A classroom experiment in teaching for peace: Solutions to global problems. Harvard Educational Review, 54, 329–333.
93.
WhiteR. K. (1966). Images in the context of international conflict: Soviet perceptions of the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. In KelmanH. C. (Ed.), International behavior: A social-psychological analysis (pp. 238–276). New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
94.
WhiteR. K. (1984). Fearful warriors: A psychological profile of U.S.-Soviet relations.New York: The Free Press.
95.
WhiteR. K. (Ed.). (1986). Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war.New York: New York University Press.
96.
WolmanC. S. (1984). Current consciousness about nuclear weapons in the United States. Unpublished manuscript.
97.
WrightsmanL. S. (1985). The social psychology of U.S. presidential effectiveness. Applied Social Psychology Annual, 6, 161–184.
98.
ZartmanI. W.TouvalS. (1985). International mediation: Conflict resolution and power politics. Journal of Social Issues, 41(2), 27–45.
99.
ZweigenhaftR. L. (1985). Providing information and shaping attitudes about nuclear dangers: Implications for public education. Political Psychology, 6, 461–480.
