Informed Consent of Students: How Much Information is Enough?

Abstract

Ethical bases of the informed consent doctrine are applied to how much information students need before they take a course. Such information includes content, grading policies, assignments, course goals, teaching philosophy, and techniques. The major justification of informed consent is autonomy; individuals need adequate information to make decisions. College may be a “standard procedure”; students give implied consent by registering. However, teaching styles may differ significantly, necessitating more information. Some techniques may involve risk of harm; the principle of beneficence must be considered here. It is concluded that providing information may increase respect for the profession and facilitate professors' self-scrutiny.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Psychological Association. (1981). Ethical principles of psychologists. American Psychologist, 36, 633–638.

Annas

G. J.

(1983). Informed consent. In Abrams

Bruckner

M. D.

(Eds.), Medical ethics (pp. 254–256). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Baumrind

(1985). Research using intentional deception: Ethical issues revisited. American Psychologist, 40, 165–174.

Beauchamp

T. L.

Childress

J. F.

(1983). Principles of biomedical ethics (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

Brown

G. I.

(1971). Human teaching for human learning: An introduction to confluent education. New York: Viking.

Handelsman

M. M.

(1985). Abstract and relational thinking via personal constructs. Teaching of Psychology, 12, 100–101.

Handelsman

M. M.

(1986, August). Are students entitled to informed consent? Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Handelsman

M. M.

Friedlander

B. L.

(1984). The use of an experiential exercise to teach about assertiveness. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 54–56.

Handelsman

M. M.

Kemper

M. B.

Kesson-Craig

P. K.

McLain

Johnsrud

(in press). Use, content, and readability of written informed consent forms for treatment. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice.

10.

Hare-Mustin

R. T.

Maracek

Kaplan

A. G.

Liss-Levinson

(1979). Rights of clients, responsibilities of therapists. American Psychologist, 34, 3–16.

11.

Holder

A. R.

(1982). Do researchers and subjects have a fiduciary relationship? IRB: A Review of Human Subjects Research, 4(1), 6–7.

12.

Hudak

M. A.

Anderson

D. E.

(1984). Teaching style and student ratings. Teaching of Psychology, 11, 177–178.

13.

Ingelfinger

F. J.

(1972). Informed (but uneducated) consent. New England Journal of Medicine, 287, 465–466.

14.

Kitchener

K. S.

(1984). Intuition, critical evaluation and ethical principles: The foundation for ethical decisions in counseling psychology. The Counseling Psychologist, 12(3), 43–55.

15.

Krantz

Huston

(1985, April). The use of psychodrama to facilitate supervisee development in master's level counseling students. Paper presented at the meeting of the Rocky Mountain Psychological Association, Tucson, AZ.